[ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R Tamplin?

[Barbara Hamrick]

I think it might be Johnson v. U.S. (597 F. Supp. 374 (1984)).

Barbara Hamrick
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Maury Siskel <maurysis at peoplepc.com>
Sender: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:06:28 
To: parthasarathy k s<ksparth at yahoo.co.uk>; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List<radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Reply-To: "The International Radiation Protection \(Health Physics\) Mailing
	List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R
	Tamplin?

Any chance anyone might recall the name of the judge cited below?  I'll 
try the search, but Gofman only doesn't get my search  very far ...  Thanks,
Maury&Dog  [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
============================

On 4/29/2013 12:18 PM, parthasarathy k s wrote:
> Dear Radsafers,
>
> You may recall that Prof John W Gofman an eminent scientist became an ardent critic of nuclear power. During the latter half of his career he used to appear before judges as expert on harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
>
> In one such case, a level headed judge made some scathing comments on the biased and irrational approach of Prof Gofman I am  not sure whether the judge expressed himself strongly against Dr Arthur R Tamplin, a close associate of Dr Gofman.
> If any of you recall the episode, I shall greatly appreciate receiving details of it at the earliest.
>
> With best regards
> Parthasarathy
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu