[ RadSafe ] Fwd: Rn-222 from Depleted Uranium
Chris Alston
achris1999 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 20 14:25:40 CDT 2013
Andrew
There is no radon, because there is no radium. If you take a look at
the half-lives of the daughters (sorry, *progeny*) intermediate
between U-238 and Ra-226, you will see that it takes near-geological
time to reach even 50% secular equilibrium, never mind >99%.
Cheers
cja
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrew McGechaen <A.McGechaen at buffaloinspection.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:18 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Rn-222 from Depleted Uranium
To: "radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Dear Sir/Madam,
My building stores about 300kg of depleted uranium. I have read that
the indoor radon hazard in buildings originates from decay products of
uranium in soil. Checking the Radium Series, I noted U-234 (245500a)
-> Th-230 (75380a) -> Ra-226 (1602a) -> Rn-222 (3.8235d), with the
attached half-lives. Fetter and von Hippel (1997) give U-234 at a
concentration of 7 ppm in DU.
Is it safe to ignore the decay chain of U-238 to U-234, and consider
only the initial concentration of U-234 ?
Is it realistic to assume that the residue of Ra-226 in the DU would
be zero after chemical refinement?
I assume the U was depleted and chemically refined years or decades
ago. What activity of Rn-222 would exist now?
Might radon escape through cracks or communicating voids in the
metallic uranium?
Might any appreciable quantity of radon escape from the uranium metal
by Fickian diffusion?
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list