[ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious thi...
Doug Aitken
JAitken at slb.com
Fri Dec 6 15:55:00 CST 2013
"Quite a bit lower"....
Most "gamma-gamma" borehole density tools use Cs-137 sources of less than 2 ci (74 GBq).... and "big" neutron sources are AmBe with <20 Ci (740 GBq).
And remember Co60 is emitting Gamma rays of double the energy of Cs-137 (1.33 and 1.16 MeV vs 662 keV)
Regards
Doug
___________________________________________________________________________________
Doug Aitken
QHSE Advisor, Schlumberger D&M Operations Support
Cell Phone: 713-562-8585
(alternate e-mail: doug.aitken at slb.com )
Mail:
Schlumberger, Drilling & Measurements HQ,
300 Schlumberger Drive, MD15,
Sugar Land, Texas 77478
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Dan McCarn
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 3:46 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Cc: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious thi...
Even the coal industry uses gamma-gamma density & neutron porosity borehole logging tools though the activities are quite a bit lower.
Dan W McCarn
108 Sherwood Blvd
Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA
+1-505-670-8123
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:05 PM, "McCloskey, Pat" <Pat.McCloskey at orau.org> wrote:
>
> The "plenty of news coverage" you wish for will probably mean a lot more negative publicity for the entire nuclear industry and make the coal lobbyists very happy.
>
> Pat McCloskey
> ________________________________________
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] on behalf of Doug Aitken
> [JAitken at slb.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 12:57 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious thi...
>
> We are all, unfortunately, in purely speculative mode....
>
> However, if the thieves have indeed been exposed to harmful (or
> lethal) doses of radiation, I hope the fact gets plenty of news
> coverage. Which might help deter other people from messing with stuff
> they do not understand.... (including, but not limited to, persons
> with political/terrorist agendas)
>
> Regards
> Doug
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _____________
> Doug Aitken
> QHSE Advisor, Schlumberger D&M Operations Support Cell Phone:
> 713-562-8585 (alternate e-mail: doug.aitken at slb.com )
> Mail:
> Schlumberger, Drilling & Measurements HQ,
> 300 Schlumberger Drive, MD15,
> Sugar Land, Texas 77478
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
> JPreisig at aol.com
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious thi...
>
> Hmmmmm,
>
> I can make hand calculations and use my old copy of the Rad Health Handbook also. But it all doesn't mean squat unless one can figure out how long the thieves stayed in the vicinity of the exposed Co-60 source. Have the thieves checked into local hospitals or have they gone home to die???
> Was puke found in the vicinity of the exposed source??? (Sorry, I couldn't think of a nice word for puke...).
>
> Someone with a working copy of MCNP might be able to compute actual doses from the source. I suspect one could get the source manufacturer schematics of the source geometry (unexposed and exposed) somewhere. Have fun!!!
>
> Joe Preisig
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/5/2013 5:33:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, DThompson3 at ameren.com writes:
>
> Wow. Not to pick on Joe specifically, but there have been several posts with quite a bit of "shooting from the hip" on dose rates from sources.
>
> I have a Radiological Health Handbook (USDHEW-1970) book at my desk, well-worn with ratty tabs.
>
> On Page 131, it says the Gamma Constant for Co-60 is 1.32 R/Hr - Ci @ 1 meter.
>
> So. for 90 Ci Cobalt 60 source, you have ~120 R/Hr. For 3000 Ci, you have
> ~4,000 R/Hr. This is at one meter. So, at a foot, those would be about 9
> times that....... 90 Ci = ~ 1100 R/hr, while 3000 Ci = ~36,000 R/hr.
>
> If you use the old 6CEN approach, for a 90 Ci source that is 6 x 90 x 1.25
> x 2 = ~1350 R/hr (at a foot). For 3000 Ci, that is ~45,000 R/HR.
> Reasonable correlation.
>
> I have a Shleien (1992) as well (it is NOT well worn nor is it tabbed).
> It has gamma ray dose constants on page 167, but they are in MBq and Sieverts. I'm a happy dinosaur with Rem and Curies, so I didn't do any calculations.........
>
>
> Grin.
>
> Dewey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Joe Nardi
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 3:14 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
> List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in
> Mexico; curious thieves likely doomed
>
> Much of what is being discussed is still speculation since it is not really known how long the unit has decayed. If it 30 years then only about 3% of the original activity will remain. If the original activity is 3,000 Ci then the remaining source would only be about 90 Ci and it would only be a category 2 shipment. The US rules for category 2 would not require real time tracking of the vehicle but only package tracking so you would know that it had not arrive at the next point at the expected time. I would say that for this incident there was early knowledge that something had happened and that is the best one could expect within the US regulations for a category 2 source.
>
> It is not clear to me that the persons involved are "doomed" but I would rather tell the news media that and see if the individuals involved are scared and seek help. At 90 Ci the source would only be reading about 21 R/min at 1 foot so it is not likely that they would have received a fatal dose.
> But as I said this is all speculation. I am going to be interested to read the detailed accounts of this incident.
>
> A. Joseph Nardi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Wasiolek,
> Maryla
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 3:30 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
> List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Stolen cobalt-60 found in
> Mexico; curious thieves likely doomed
>
> In the USA it would be unlikely for a truck with Category 1 quantity of radioactive material to have gone missing. See 10 CFR 37.79, Requirements for physical protection of category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive material during shipment.
> http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part037/part037-0079
> .html
>
> M. Wasiolek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Perle,
> Sandy
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:47 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
> List
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico;
> curious thieves likely doomed
>
> Hello John,
>
> I would not presume that this kind of incident or others would not happen here in the USA or any other country. Things do happen and we have seen those things happen in the past. I would never state that there is no potential for a source to be unattended. For instance, there are numerous notices where department of transportation sources are stolen from government vehicles.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sandy
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:42 AM, "Joel.Love" <Joel.Love at carle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why would it not happen here? The driver(s) were held up at gun-point.
> Now, I do all I can to protect my hospital from incidents but I'm not sure I wouldn't hand over all my less than 1 Ci of I-125 to someone with a gun in my nose.
>>
>> Joe Love Radiation Safety Officer
>> joel.love at carle.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of
>> JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com
>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:35 PM
>> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>> List
>> Cc: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious
>> thieves likely doomed
>>
>> Radsafers
>> I tuned in to this one late, but if it hasn't already been
>> discussed, we
> need to be prepared to tell the media why it won't happen here. It would seem that a shipment like this would not be left unattended so that theft
> is "highly unlikely". Not trying to start a new thread, but I haven't
> enough experience in source shipment to be able to explain how we prevent this kind of theft.
>>
>> So, a short paragraph would be much appreciated Thx in advance -
>> -jmr
>>
>> John Rich
>> 312-269-3768
>>
>>
>>
>> From: JPreisig at aol.com
>> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>> Date: 12/05/2013 01:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious
>> thieves likely doomed
>> Sent by: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmmmm,
>>
>> So, what's the deal ---> these Co-60 thiefs couldn't read the
> warnings on the Cobalt source??? Ouch.
>> They actually exposed the source --- how unfortunate. I guess if
>> they are
>>
>> lucky they will check into a local Hospital with gastrointestinal
> radiation syndrome or worse. I guess they walked away from the scene of the crime.
>>
>> The various forms of radiation sickness are described, I think, in
>> Eric
> Hall's book on Radiobiology/Biophysics.
>>
>> Joe Preisig
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 12/5/2013 2:09:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> jim.hardeman at gmail.com writes:
>>
>> Oops -- unit error. I meant ~700 R/min. Sorry about that.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:56 PM, <roseb at gdls.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jim:
>>>
>>> Your math is a bit off, the specific gamma-ray constant for Co-60
>>> is
>> 1.37
>>> R/hr @ 1 m. The exposure rate from a 3,000 Ci Co-60 source would
>>> be
>> much
>>> higher than 700 rad/h at 1 ft (~0.33 m).
>>>
>>> Henry
>>>
>>> Boyd H. Rose, CM, CIH, CHMM, EI
>>> Sr. Safety and Environmental Engineering Specialist Corporate
>>> Radiation Safety Officer General Dynamics Land Systems
>>> 38500 Mound Road
>>> Mail Zone 436-10-75
>>> Sterling Heights , MI 48310-3269
>>> Tel: 586 825 4503
>>> Fax: 586 825 4015
>>> E-mail: roseb at gdls.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Hardeman <jim.hardeman at gmail.com> Sent by:
>>> radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
>>> 12/05/2013 01:47 PM
>>> Please respond to
>>> "The International Radiation Protection \(Health Physics\) Mailing
>> List"
>>> <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>> To
>>> "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List"
>>> <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
>>> cc
>>>
>>> Subject
>>> Re: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious thieves
>> likely
>>> doomed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Doomed? Probably so. If I did my math right, they would have been
>> looking
>>> at ~700 rad/h at a foot.
>>>
>>> The question is, will medical personnel be able to make a proper
>> diagnosis
>>> of ARS?
>>>
>>> Jim Hardeman -- retired :-)
>>> Decatur, GA
>>> jim.hardeman at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Boing, Lawrence E.
>>>> <lboing at anl.gov>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's what I read somewhere yesterday as well ....3,000 Curies....
>>>>
>>>> L Boing
>>>> lboing at anl.gov
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:
>>>> radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Lemieux, Bryan P
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:10 PM
>>>> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics)
>>>> Mailing
>> List
>>>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious
>>> thieves
>>>> likely doomed
>>>>
>>>> I read 3000 Ci.....
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 5, 2013 11:39 AM, "Estabrooks, H Bates (IHK)" <
>>>> estabrookshb at y12.doe.gov> wrote:
>>>> Has anyone revealed/published the activity of the source?
>>>>
>>>> Bates Estabrooks
>>>> Y-12 NSC
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:
>>>> radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Harrison - CDPHE,
>> Tony
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:31 AM
>>>> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>>>> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Stolen cobalt-60 found in Mexico; curious
>> thieves
>>>> likely doomed
>>>>
>>>> MEXICO CITY - The carjackers who set off international alarm bells
>>>> by absconding with a truckload of highly radioactive material
>>>> most
>> likely
>>> had
>>>> no idea what they were stealing and will probably die soon from
>>> exposure,
>>>> Mexican authorities said at the end of a brief national scare...
>>>>
>>>> The cobalt-60 was found, removed from its casing, in a rural area
>> near
>>> the
>>>> town of Hueypoxtla about 25 miles from where the truck was stolen.
>>> Jimenez
>>>> suspected that curiosity got the better of the thieves and they
>> opened
>>> the
>>>> box. So far the carjackers have not been arrested, but
>>>> authorities
>>> expect
>>>> they will not live long.
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/stolen-cobalt-60-found-in-mexico-
>> c
>>
>> urious-thieves-likely-doomed/2013/12/05/262ef990-5d66-11e3-8d24-31c01
>> 6
>> b976b2_st
>>
>> ory.html?hpid=z1
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tony Harrison, MSPH
>>>>
>>>> Inorganic & Radiochemistry Supervisor
>>>>
>>>> Laboratory Services Division
>>>>
>>>> Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
>>>>
>>>> 8100 Lowry Blvd.
>>>>
>>>> Denver, CO 80230
>>>>
>>>> 303-692-3046 |
>>> tony.harrison at state.co.us____________________________________________
>>> _ __ > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list >
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
>>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>>> settings
>>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>>
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
>>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>>> settings
>>>> visit:
>>
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu___________________________________________
>> _
>> ___
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list > Before
>>>> posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
>>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>>> settings
>>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>>
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
>>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>>
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>>> settings
>>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>> settings
>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>>> settings
>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>> settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>> settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>> settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
>
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. Note that any views or
> opinions presented in this message are solely those of the author and
> do not necessarily represent those of Ameren. All e-mails are subject
> to monitoring and archival. Finally, the recipient should check this message and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
> Ameren accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. If you have received this in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and
> deleting the material from any computer. Ameren Corporation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list