[ RadSafe ] Teller and Climate change

[Brent Rogers]

If 32,000 'scientists' signed an Internet petition rejecting hormesis, I probably wouldn't pay much attention.  I'm more interested in what health physicists and radiation biologists have to say on the matter.  Similarly, the opinions of actual climate scientists trump any .org petition groups view on issues of climate.

Brent Rogers
Sydney Australia

Brevity alert: Sent from my iPad

On 02/03/2013, at 8:13, marco bähler <m.c.baehler at bluewin.ch> wrote:

> EDWARD TELLER
> 
> half a century ago, edward teller said:
> " ... not a single atomic power plant should be built above the ground..." 
> ( fuller, john g : we almost lost detroit, page 123 ) 
> 
> marco bähler
> kleindorfstrasse 105
> ch- 8707 uetikon
> switzerland
> 
> 
> Am 01.03.2013 um 19:49 schrieb Howard Long:
> 
>> Climate changes are NOT human caused by carbon combustion,
>> Susan! Pertinence to health physics is clear, as with "Vitamin R", radiation hormesis.
>> 
>> Edward Teller leads our 32,000 scientists, at www.petitionproject.org 
>> with conclusive data backing REJECTION  of the selective, global tax hoax of
>> global cooling, global warming or climate change.
>> 
>> Howard Long MD, MPH, Board member of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness
>>      (started by Edward Teller)
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 28, 2013, at 5:59 PM, S L Gawarecki <slgawarecki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> This is a radiation safety list.  Most of the folks here are technical
>>> experts in the field of health physics, nuclear engineering, or a related
>>> field dealing with radioactivity.  I've notice that this group tend to
>>> reject and marginalize those agenda-driven list members (generally
>>> anti-nuclear activists) who advance theories about the terrible health
>>> effects of DU or exposure to low level radiation.
>>> 
>>> Similarly, climate scientists know that the buildup of greenhouse gases is
>>> causing global warming.  Like all of you, they are technical experts in
>>> their field.  And yes, they marginalize and reject those that disagree with
>>> them and who aren't willing to examine the scientific underpinnings.
>>> 
>>> Interestingly, it was the former CEO of ExxonMobil that funded a group of
>>> scientists to come up with arguments against human-induced global warming
>>> because to have carbon controls become government policy would harm his
>>> company.  This was eagerly accepted by a largely conservative audience to
>>> serve partisan ends.
>>> 
>>> I suggest that if you have serious doubts about the human-caused component
>>> of global warming, go talk to several climate scientists (not
>>> meteorologists--weather is different from climate) and have a look at their
>>> data.  The science is there, just like it is for those who work with
>>> radiation.
>>> 
>>> Regards,*
>>> **Susan Gawarecki*
>>> 
>>> ph: 865-494-0102
>>> cell:  865-604-3724
>>> SLGawarecki at gmail.com
>>> 
>>> Steve Frey wrote:
>>> "Unconvincing. And the "To deny any link between greenhouse gases and the
>>> average Earth temperature reality is an extreme case of hubris"remark is not
>>> only patronizing, it's hysteria weakens your claim.
>>> 
>>> Since global warming proponents got caught conspiring to ostracize critics
>>> in the University of East Anglia email dump, global warming lost its
>>> credibility. Moreover, changing of "global warming" to "climate change" is
>>> actually refreshing, because it smacks of recognition by proponents that the
>>> public isn't buying it. But, what a whopper of a mistake to rename it such
>>> that every weather problem can be attributed to greenhouse gases. All  of
>>> it,
>>> all the time. You might as well cry "Wolf!"."
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>> 
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>> 
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>