[ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R Tamplin?
sjd at swcp.com
Fri May 10 07:10:47 CDT 2013
Niagara Net's name is Louis Ricciuti. See the RADSAFE
archives of Feb. 2011 for his four contributions that month.
At 05:24 AM 5/10/2013, you wrote:
>I strongly recommend that you S H U T U P ! (Any native speaker
>who can assist me with a more polite phrase with the same meaning is
>kindly asked to help me.)
>You are even more primitive than I thought, except your ability to
>know what has happened thousands of kilometers (not miles) away from
>you. I am not obliged to inform you about personal circumstances and
>what has caused
>my accident. You are a prototype of a troll and obviously you do not
>only know nothing about the RADSAFE topics but also lack the most
>simple manners and good behaviour towards other people.
>Another and last time I urge you to leave RADSAFE voluntarily. As
>well I urge other RADSAFErs to treat this NiagaraNet (who seems not
>even to have a name) as what he is: a troll.
>From: NiagaraNet at aol.com
>Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 9:21 PM
>To: franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ?
>Arthur R Tamplin?
>And dropping something on one's foot enough to break a bone and five
>toes...is certainly NOT a "protection professional" at all.
>If you can't protect even yourself with steel toe shoes and instep
>guards, HOW can you protect anyone from radiation injury??
>In a message dated 5/9/2013 11:40:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>franz.schoenhofer at chello.at writes:
> does not make you a radiation protection professional.
More information about the RadSafe