[ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R Tamplin?

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Fri May 10 07:10:47 CDT 2013

May 10

         Niagara Net's name is Louis Ricciuti.  See the RADSAFE 
archives of Feb. 2011 for his four contributions that month.


Steven Dapra

At 05:24 AM 5/10/2013, you wrote:
>Mr NiagaraNet,
>I strongly recommend that you  S H U T   U P ! (Any native speaker 
>who can assist me with a more polite phrase with the same meaning is 
>kindly asked to help me.)
>You are even more primitive than I thought, except your ability to 
>know what has happened thousands of kilometers (not miles) away from 
>you. I am not obliged to inform you about personal circumstances and 
>what has caused
>my accident. You are a prototype of a troll and obviously you do not 
>only know nothing about the RADSAFE topics but also lack the most 
>simple manners and good behaviour towards other people.
>Another and last time I urge you to leave RADSAFE voluntarily. As 
>well I urge other RADSAFErs to treat this NiagaraNet (who seems not 
>even to have a name) as what he is: a troll.
>From: NiagaraNet at aol.com
>Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 9:21 PM
>To: franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? 
>Arthur R Tamplin?
>And dropping something on one's foot enough to break a bone and five 
>toes...is certainly NOT a "protection professional" at all.
>If you can't protect even yourself with steel toe shoes and instep 
>guards, HOW can you protect anyone from radiation injury??
>In a message dated 5/9/2013 11:40:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
>franz.schoenhofer at chello.at writes:
>   does not make you a radiation protection professional.

More information about the RadSafe mailing list