[ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R Tamplin?

Franz Schönhofer franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
Fri May 10 06:24:57 CDT 2013

Mr NiagaraNet,

I strongly recommend that you  S H U T   U P ! (Any native speaker who can assist me with a more polite phrase with the same meaning is kindly asked to help me.)

You are even more primitive than I thought, except your ability to know what has happened thousands of kilometers (not miles) away from you. I am not obliged to inform you about personal circumstances and what has caused
my accident. You are a prototype of a troll and obviously you do not only know nothing about the RADSAFE topics but also lack the most simple manners and good behaviour towards other people.

Another and last time I urge you to leave RADSAFE voluntarily. As well I urge other RADSAFErs to treat this NiagaraNet (who seems not even to have a name) as what he is: a troll.


From: NiagaraNet at aol.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 9:21 PM
To: franz.schoenhofer at chello.at 
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] A judges' criticism of John W Gofman ? Arthur R Tamplin?

And dropping something on one's foot enough to break a bone and five toes...is certainly NOT a "protection professional" at all.

If you can't protect even yourself with steel toe shoes and instep guards, HOW can you protect anyone from radiation injury??

In a message dated 5/9/2013 11:40:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, franz.schoenhofer at chello.at writes:
  does not make you a radiation protection professional. 

More information about the RadSafe mailing list