[ RadSafe ] Anyone want to take over the list

[Jeff Terry]

The listserver can support the new standard but the University does not want posts not having the posters name and email attached. 

University wants post properly attributed to the poster as opposed to the the new standard below:

Jeff


The new standard would require all posts to be:

On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:59 pm, The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu> wrote:

Blah, Blah, Blah  




On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can the university support the new standard?
> 
> 
> Dan ii
> 
> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
> 108 Sherwood Blvd
> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
> +1-505-672-2014 (Home – New Mexico)
> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
> 
> 
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Excessive bounces to their email addresses. They must have adopted the
>> same standard.
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Dan McCarn <hotgreenchile at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Why the NRC?
>>> 
>>> Dan ii
>>> 
>>> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
>>> 108 Sherwood Blvd
>>> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
>>> +1-505-672-2014 (Home – New Mexico)
>>> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
>>> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Terry <terryj at iit.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> We lost everyone from the NRC off the list today.
>>>> 
>>>> We are not allowed by the University legal department to take
>>>> responsibility for all list posts by allowing anonymous posting. This is
>>>> the only current solution to blocking of listerservers by some of the
>> major
>>>> internet service providers.
>>>> 
>>>> If someone else would like to take over the list and run it using that
>>>> method, I would be happy to pass the running of the list along.
>>>> 
>>>> Otherwise, given the steady decline of membership, it may be time to
>> just
>>>> end the list.
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry but I don't see another practical solution.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>> 
>>>> Jeff
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>>>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>>>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>>> 
>>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>>>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>> 
>>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>> 
>>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>> 
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>> 
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu