[ RadSafe ] Update on lead aprons in nuclear medicine

[Ted de Castro]

Sure - its a LAB isn't it??  Isn't that were experiments are done?

Its almost like a routine survey - with just one extra step <grin>

I would have been quicker than writing to RADSAFE and waiting for a 
reply - and even could have been followed up with an experimental report 
to RADSAFE to enlighten the rest of us!

Just a radical thought.

On 8/25/2014 4:28 PM, Brennan, Mike (DOH) wrote:
> What, you mean like an experiment?
>
> To quote one of my favorite XKCD cartoons; "Stand Back!  I am going to try SCIENCE!"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ted de Castro
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 4:22 PM
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Update on lead aprons in nuclear medicine
>
> If you want to do it the 'round about hard way - sure.
>
> If you really want to know the attenuation for a particular isotope you use ...... Just measure it.
>
> On 8/25/2014 3:42 PM, Lemieux, Bryan P wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> You also need to look at what energy the lead equivalence is at.  Many of these composite materials are only "lead equivalent" in the energy range for scatter x-rays from diagnostic energy x-ray beams..... Get the manufacturer data on the actual attenuation properties by energy to see what it would be for your gammas.
>>
>>
>> Bryan Lemieux, M.S., CHP
>> Radiation Safety Officer
>> University of Tennessee Health Science Center
>> 3 N Dunlap St. S110 Van Vleet Bldg
>> Memphis, TN 38163
>> Phone:  901-448-6114
>> Fax:      901-448-7774
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Jeremy
>> Nicoll
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 5:33 PM
>> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>> List
>> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Update on lead aprons in nuclear medicine
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what you're working with, how much and how close, for how long etc., but the HVL for Tc-99m gammas is 0.3 mm Pb, so that should let you do some calcs.  If the thicknesses you talk of are Pb equivalences then the apron isn't going to do a lot, compared with the inconvenience of wearing it, and the thyroid shield, and perhaps the Pb glass specs.
>> I don't know of any Nuc Med unit where aprons are worn routinely for RP.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> Dr Jeremy J Nicoll
>> Radiation Safety Advisor
>> University of Otago
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
>> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ålund Maria
>> Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2014 12:16 a.m.
>> To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
>> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Update on lead aprons in nuclear medicine
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering if the lead aprons has ben improved for nuclear
>> medicine workers the latest years. I read a question dated from 1997,
>> *Lead aprons in nuclear medicine,*
>> (*http://health.phys.iit.edu/extended_archive/9703/msg00011.html
>> <http://health.phys.iit.edu/extended_archive/9703/msg00011.html>) *that stated that lead aprons suitable for x-rays is not necessarily enough shield to be used for gamma rays. Are the composite aprons that weight less equal as good as a conventional lead apron nowadays? And which thickness should then be used? The aprons that are being used at my workplace is made of the composite material and has the thickness of 0.25 and 0.35mm. The radiophysics says that this is enough.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maria Ålund
>>
>> Biomedical scientist, Sweden
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>>
>> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu