[ RadSafe ] Fwd: Pilots UV-A radiation exposure
JPreisig at aol.com
JPreisig at aol.com
Mon Dec 22 21:49:05 CST 2014
Joe,
I guess there's an Ed Bramlitt. I also believe there's a Bramblett,
Ewing and Bonner --- inventors of Bonner Neutron Spectrometry. See
Patterson and Thomas's Accelerator Health Physics. See also Cossairt's
Accelerator Health Physics course notes/manual.
Joe Preisig
PS Badges are OK in airplanes....but one really needs a Neutron
Spectrometer (for thermal neutron to 20 MeV energies) and a plastic scintillator
(n,2n reaction) for 20 MeV to 400 MeV neutrons. Scintillator see the back end
of Patterson and Thomas's Accelerator Health Physics book (McCaslins's
plastic scintillator lab exercise).
a message dated 12/21/2014 2:36:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jjshonka at shonka.com writes:
Hans
I am quite interested in your badge results, and what would be a
significant radiation exposure. You have an unusually high number of frequent flyer
miles. If we assume total neutron plus gamma of 500 mrem (5 mSv) per
100,000 frequent flyer miles or per year, and 15 rem over a 3 million mile or
30 year career, I have the following questions: (1) were your badges
neutron sensitive (80% of GCR dose is due to neutrons)?; (2) how often were
they read out (quarterly, monthly?); (3) were many of your miles extra credits
rather than actual miles flown (e.g. first class gets 2X miles)?; (4) were
your miles collected evenly or did you travel more extensively during some
fraction of your career?; (5) what would you say the reporting limit or
detection limit of the badges was (e.g any reading less than 10 mrem (0.1
mSv) reported as 0)?; (6) were your badges used for work and did they have
measureable exposure from sources other than background plus your flight time?
Ed Bramlitt and I have a note in the January, 2015 issue of Health Physics
that discusses intermittent sources of exposure to aircrew, including
solar proton, neutron and gamma events and terrestrial gamma flashes. About 1%
of the 1200 Terrestrial gamma flashes that are large enough to be detected
by satellites that occur each day (world-wide) approach estimated doses in
aircraft of up to 30 to 100 mSv, for example. Although rare, these likely
would have been observed on your badge. The more numerous dose of 10 mSv
or greater (my estimate of the lower limit of detection for the GBM
detectors on board FERMI) might also be detectable, however, presumably even more
numerous but undetectable lower dose TGFs (below 10 mSv) might not be
detected. I am interested in how large one of those events could have been
without your noticing an unusual reading.
I assume the background control badges were at your place of employment.
Finally, (7) For example, if you typically had 12 flights per quarter, and
one of those flights encountered a source that provided 1,000 mrem (10 mSv)
80 % of which was neutron and only 200 mrem (2 mSv) was gamma, would you
have noticed it as an unusual badge reading?
Joe Shonka
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Hans J Wiegert
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 7:18 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
For what it's worth.
I am not so sure about this. During my career I traveled almost 3 million
miles on various airlines with my seating preference being a window seat.
Never noticed anything like this. As a side note, on almost all of those
trips I carried a film badge on me and in recent years the Landauer Luxel
OSL badge. The badges never showed any significant radiation exposure.
Best Regards,
Hans
*Retirement is, when the only day you have to set your alarm clock is
Sunday - so you are not late for church!*
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Chris Alston <achris1999 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is easy to believe. I, as a passenger, have gotten a pretty good
> tan, mostly on one side of my face, on just one trip from Seattle to
> San Diego. Fortunately, I had a window seat on the other side of the
> aircraft (DC-9 family, for whatever it is worth) on the northward
> return flight, to "touch up" the other side of my face, else I would
> have looked like that arch-criminal in the Batman comics.
>
> Cheers
> cja
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:36 PM, ROY HERREN <royherren2005 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hopefully the following isn't too "off topic", given that the article
is
> dealing with UV-A radiation.
> >
>
http://media.jamanetwork.com/news-item/airline-pilots-can-be-exposed-to-cockpit-radiation-similar-to-tanning-beds/
> > Airline Pilots Can Be Exposed to Cockpit Radiation Similar to Tanning
> Beds
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list