[ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] Re: Fwd: Fwd: [New post] Raised radiation level found inMissouri Snow
mwasiol at sandia.gov
Tue Jan 7 13:55:44 CST 2014
When the snow melts and the soil moisture is high the opposite effect may happen as well, i.e., radon exhalation from soil may be very low when soil pores get filled with water.
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Shonka
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 12:09 PM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ RadSafe ] Fwd: Fwd: [New post] Raised radiation level found inMissouri Snow
When the ground freezes, radon emanation rates go to near zero. The ground a few hundred kilometers west of the area provides most of the radon seen in the atmosphere in the northern hemisphere. This radon would be available for co-precipitation during rainfall or snowfall events. When spring thaw comes, radon can be much higher than "normal" for a short time due to higher than normal levels of radon in the ground. ANL reported an incident many years ago due to this phenomenon.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Chris Alston <achris1999 at gmail.com> wrote:
> What is happening to the radon source term, given the cold and
> snowpack? I can remember, many years ago, when I was green as a
> grasshopper, doing verification of remedial action for depleted U on a
> property (a large lawn or backyard, from which we had stripped the
> sod) with a FIDLER, during an afternoon when it was warm, sunny, and
> breezy. I went back to finish work the next morning, when it was
> cold, damp, and heavily foggy (the airport was socked-in). The whole
> area was "hot" again. Baffled, I walkie-talkied my boss. He laughed,
> and explained, basically, that due to the low-pressure, more *natural*
> radon was emanating from the soil, and it was not moving much, due to
> the cold, so the daughters were ingrowing. In effect, our carefully
> determined gamma background for the area was out the window.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brennan, Mike (DOH) <Mike.Brennan at doh.wa.gov>
> Date: Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Fwd: [New post] Raised radiation level found
> inMissouri Snow
> To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics)
> MailingList" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu> I don't know the answer to
> this offhand, but how does the response of a GM tube change with
> temperature? The reason I ask is that it is currently COLD in much of
> the Midwest, and it wouldn't surprise me if things are different at
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
Joseph J. Shonka, Ph.D.
Shonka Research Associates, Inc.
119 Ridgemore Circle
Toccoa, GA 30577
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify Shonka Research Associates, Inc. at (770) 509-7606 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe