[ RadSafe ] Chernobyl

Brad Keck bradkeck at mac.com
Wed Oct 7 15:48:27 CDT 2015


All,

In the wee hours ( US time ) of the morning, CNN broadcast an interview with Jim Smith of the University of Portsmouth - an author of this study.   

While the interviewers expressed a little incredulity at the result, the caption banner running under the interview said something to the effect that radiation levels posed no risk to Chernobyl wildlife.  ( I apologize for the imprecise quote, but I had no business being up at that hour :}    )  In all, it was a fair presentation of the results and the author was allowed to speak directly - good to see.   

Congratulations to Prof. Smith and other authors for penetrating the TV media with real science!

Bradly D. Keck



> On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Doss, Mohan <Mohan.Doss at fccc.edu> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>     A long-term study of wildlife in Chernobyl http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982215009884  published recently states (referring to the 2013 study by Møller and Mousseau):
> "However, a previous study of mammals using track counts [3] reported a negative relationship between radiation levels and mammal density. The discrepancy with our data is likely because this previous study [3] covered only 16.1 km of transects examined just once. Our data are derived from transects with a total length that is 20 times larger and repeated in two (21 routes) or three (14 routes) years."
>    This is a nice debunking of the results and claims of [3], Møller and Mousseau (2013), Assessing effects of radiation on abundance of mammals and predator-prey interactions in Chernobyl using tracks in the snow. Ecol. Indic. 26, 112-116. 
>    The deer in the highest dose category had dose rates of ~50 microGy per hour in 2009 (Table S3, Supplemental Data), and so would have experienced quite high total doses over the years. The deer population for the highest dose routes does not seem to have decreased (Figure S1, Supplemental Data) in comparison to lower dose routes. 
>    With best regards,
>                                     Mohan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Preisig
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 12:11 PM
> To: radsafe
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Chernobyl
> 
> Radsafe,
> 
> See news item on Google News
> 
> Wildlife doing well around Chernobyl...
> 
> Joe Preisig
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication may contain private, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient or have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and permanently delete all copies of this email including all attachments without reading them. If you are the intended recipient, secure the contents in a manner that conforms to all applicable state and/or federal requirements related to privacy and confidentiality of such information.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu



More information about the RadSafe mailing list