[ RadSafe ] DNA Repair
PHILIP.KARAM at nypd.org
Wed Oct 21 09:54:12 CDT 2015
One thing I find interesting is that the rate of DNA mis-repair is remarkably consistent among widely disparate organisms - very low, but within an order of magnitude for microbes, mammals, and pretty much everything in between. To me, this suggests that there is an optimum error rate that typically conserves genetic information, but that "allows" a degree of experimentation; without this mis-repair, the highest form of life on Earth would likely still be the cyanobacteria. We need DNA repair, of course, to maintain genetic fidelity from one generation to the next - but perfect fidelity would make evolution, if not impossible, then at the least, very very slow.
Like others, I agree there is no need to invoke creationism - no matter how it is phrased. Basic scientific principles and laws seem quite adequate.
As an aside, Schroedinger wrote an extended essay called "What is Life" (adapted from a series of lectures he gave in the 1940s) in which he discusses - among other things - the inevitability of DNA mutations. This was the first work that really laid out the need for a "heredity molecule" as well as discussing how quantum mechanics made mutations (and, hence, evolution) inescapable. Watson and Crick both cited this work as inspiring their own research into the structure of DNA.
More information about the RadSafe