[ RadSafe ] LNT and the WHO guidance on red meat

Ludwig E. Feinendegen feinendegen at gmx.net
Wed Oct 28 12:41:42 CDT 2015


Very true, Mohan. Thanks! Ludwig

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] Im Auftrag von Doss, Mohan
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 17:54
An: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] LNT and the WHO guidance on red meat

It is the standard (though unjustified) method used for radiation, i.e. even
though no statistically significant increase in colon cancers has been
observed at low intake of red meat, by linear extrapolation the high intake
risk is transferred to low intakes. If ICRP were given the task of advising
regarding red meat, they would likely recommend banning all red meat
consumption, since ALARA would be zero red meat consumption. For low
consumption of meat, there is indeed a possibility of hormetic reduction of
colon cancers, as the data do not rule it out (Please note this statement is
from reading just one publication on this topic). 
                                                     Mohan



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of jjshonka at shonka.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 11:27 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [ RadSafe ] LNT and the WHO guidance on red meat

All:

Given the recent RadSafe posts on LNT for radiation, I have a question.  The
recent WHO caution on consumption of processed or red meat has resulted in
projections of cancer deaths caused by bacon.  One site asserts that eating
9 slices of bacon is equivalent to the cancer risk of smoking one cigarette.
Does this calculation rest on an assumption of linearity and no threshold as
well?  Are the objections raised against LNT for radiation applicable to
this form of carcinogen?

see:
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/3013/whats-worse-for-your-health-ba
con-or-cigarettes





Joe Shonka




Sent from Windows Mail
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication may contain private,
confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of
the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are not the
intended recipient or have received this email in error, please notify the
sender immediately by email and permanently delete all copies of this email
including all attachments without reading them. If you are the intended
recipient, secure the contents in a manner that conforms to all applicable
state and/or federal requirements related to privacy and confidentiality of
such information.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu



More information about the RadSafe mailing list