[ RadSafe ] Panasonic UD-814 Technical Specification Sheet (hope the link is better this time)

[Sander Perle]

Thanks Stacey,

Yes, this is a more accurate full statement. Unless there is an error for
one or more of the elements ³correction factor² there is typically not an
issue. The Panasonic 814AS is an excellent environmental dosimeter, as is
the Thermo environmental dosimeter.

Regards,

Sandy
Retired, Consultant

From:  <radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu> on behalf of Stacey Alderson
<salderson at stoller.com>
Reply-To:  "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Date:  Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:48 AM
To:  "radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Subject:  Re: [ RadSafe ] Panasonic UD-814 Technical Specification Sheet
(hope the link is better this time)

> Thanks Sandy for the clarification.  I appreciate the response since my
> experience with TLD data processing and assessment is minimal.
> 
> Here is the actual text in the document I was reviewing: "A single TLD is
> considered three data points (samples) because it contains three separate
> elements that measure dose independently. The variability of the readings is
> evaluated to determine if three data points are sufficient."
> 
> To summarize due to close proximity of the elements on the card and the lack
> of variability in the environmental radiation field there should not be much
> variability between the elements.  If there is variability this may indicate
> an issue with the element correction.
> 
> Thanks Again,
> 
> Stacey
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu
>