[ RadSafe ] Recommendations for data-logging ion chamber
john.p.jones at usu.edu
Sat Apr 23 11:03:57 CDT 2016
We've had a 9DP for about 3 years and can set it to record data every
second. I don't recall seeing an option for continuous.
As long as a thumb drive is plugged into the unit, data is saved as it's
Settings are changed by connecting a somewhat simple keyboard to a USB plug
on the instrument. I had to get a cheap keyboard from our surplus group
because my old Microsoft ergonomic style is a little too complicated.
Some choices can be made about data and units. If it might help I can send
a file to review.
Syncing the meter's internal clock with our watches is interesting, but
We like ours because the -1 had a limitation we wanted to avoid. Shipping
it back for calibration hasn't been a problem because we depressurize the
Utah State University
john.p.jones at usu.edu
Sent with AquaMail for Android
On April 22, 2016 6:07:55 PM Carl Willis <carl.willis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello RADSAFErs,
> I am looking for opinions on ion chamber instruments with the following
> criteria being especially relevant to my application:
> -Capable of logging data continuously, i.e. generating a doserate versus
> time record
> -Easy to clean, i.e. surface and operating controls easily decontaminated
> using soap/water
> -Chamber sealed, but not pressurized to HAZMAT levels
> -Capable of performing well in cool, high-humidity environments (mostly
> relates to how well the signal and chamber bias insulators are protected
> from ambient air)
> -Wide response range. Ideally, I would like an instrument that can measure
> from single mR/hr to approximately 500 R/hr. I think that's a tall order,
> but I'll throw it out in case there is an option someone knows about.
> -Backlit display that can be read in very poor light conditions
> In particular, the Ludlum 9DP-1 ticks most of these boxes, I think. Is
> anyone familiar with its data logging functions? Can it be set to
> automatically log as I have described, or must the user signal it to log a
> point every time? Major downside of that instrument seems to be its battery
> (heavy, and consumed at an atrocious rate even with the backlight off).
> Does anyone know how it behaves in fields that exceed 50 R/hr?
> Thanks for any assistance.
> Best regards,
> Carl Willis
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
More information about the RadSafe