[ RadSafe ] After Five Years, What Is The Cost Of Fukushima?

[Joseph Preisig]

Radsafe/Sander Perle,

       Japan does not have to eliminate the nuclear option.  They simply
have to build their fission reactors 10
miles inland from the ocean shorelines, so they are not susceptible to
tsunamis from large/great earthquakes.  They can
also build high enough seawalls to minimize the effects of tsunamis.  New
reactors should be built away from fault-lines.
Back-up power generators of shoreline nuclear reactors need to be in their
own concrete buildings, if possible.  I don't make decisions
about which Japanese reactors will continue to operate and which will close.

     Joe Preisig


On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Sander Perle <sandyfl at cox.net> wrote:

> Joe,
>
> One more point. If you agree that current units should be allowed to
> operate until their operating life is over, then you ignore your very
> premise that these units are too vulnerable from 8.0 to 9.0 earthquakes. If
> you truly believe that there is a significant probability for other
> disasters, then your proposal should be to shut them down now. I don't
> agree.
>
> Consider that while there have been many other earthquakes over the years,
> Fukushima remains not the norm.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sandy
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 10, 2016, at 19:31, Joseph Preisig <jrpnj01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Radsafe,
> >
> >     Japan is vulnerable to magnitude 8.0 to 9.0 earthquakes, and possible
> > tsunamis.  Such earthquakes will happen again
> > and again.  No nuclear power plants should be built on Japan's Ocean
> > shores.  Nuclear plants currently on Japan's ocean
> > shorelines should be allowed to live out their operating life and then
> > should be closed.  This should also be the case for other countries
> > with exposure to large/great earthquakes and tsunamis.
> >
> >     Joe Preisig
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, parthasarathy k s <ksparth at yahoo.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you Dan. The Forbes article provided at one place important
> details
> >> on the cost of the Fukushima accident
> >> Warm regardsParthasarathy
> >>
> >>    On Thursday, 10 March 2016, 23:42, Dan McCarn <
> hotgreenchile at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> This is from my friend, Jim Conca.
> >>
> >> *After Five Years, What Is The Cost Of Fukushima?*
> >>
> >> The direct costs of the Fukushima disaster will be about $15 billion in
> >> clean-up over the next 20 years and over $60 billion in refugee
> >> compensation. Replacing Japan’s 300 billion kWhs from nuclear each year
> >> with fossil fuels has costJapan over $200 billion, mostly from fuel
> costs
> >> for natural gas, fuel oil and coal. This cost will at least double, and
> >> that only if the nuclear fleet is mostly restarted by 2020. Since 2011,
> >> Japan’s trade deficit has become the worst in its history, and Japan is
> now
> >> the second largest net importer of fossil fuel in the world, right
> behind
> >> China. Strangely, the costs that never materialized were the most
> feared,
> >> those of radiation-induced cancer and death.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/03/10/after-five-years-what-is-the-cost-of-fukushima/#3a7a79346016
> >>
> >> Dan ii
> >>
> >> Dan W McCarn, Geologist
> >> 108 Sherwood Blvd
> >> Los Alamos, NM 87544-3425
> >> +1-505-670-8123 (Mobile - New Mexico)
> >> HotGreenChile at gmail.com (Private email) HotGreenChile at gmail dot com
> >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dwmccarn
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >>
> >> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> >> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> >> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >>
> >> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> >> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >>
> >> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> >> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> >> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >>
> >> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> >> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>