[ RadSafe ] [EXTERNAL] *** SPAM *** Re: *** SPAM *** Re: Book on early radiation-related discoveries

[McClung, Danny]

I personally don't mind a little spam. Scrapple, too! 👍



-----Original Message-----
From: Ted de Castro [tdc at xrayted.com<mailto:tdc at xrayted.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 03:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ RadSafe ] *** SPAM *** Re: *** SPAM *** Re: Book on early radiation-related discoveries


Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  How dare it SPAM me!! On 3/8/2017 12:26 PM, Ted de Castro
  wrote: > Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu",
   has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
   > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
   > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > the administrator
   of that system for details. > > Content preview: On x-ray history the book
   "Trail of the Invisible Light" by > Grieg (something like that) is most comprehensive.
   A good albeit long read > - very thick. On 3/8/2017 11:20 AM, Rees, Brian
   G wrote: > I was teaching > a class this week and discussed some early work
   with radiation. Later on > I realized that this was an area that I'd benefit
   from some further reading > in. Is there a decent book that succinctly describes
   the work of the pioneers > and experiments/discoveries (Rutherford, Chadwick,
   Curies, etc.) that you'd > recommend? > > Thanks in advance, > Brian Rees
   > > You are currently subscribed > to the RadSafe mailing list > > Before
   posting a message to RadSafe be sure > to have read and understood the RadSafe
   rules. These can be found at: http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
   > > > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
   > visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu [...] > > Content analysis details: (5.5
   points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- > 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
   RBL: Relay in RNBL, > https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ > [24.4.193.21
   listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] > 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a
   relay in Spamhaus PBL > [24.4.193.21 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] > 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL
   SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) > 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL:
   SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address > [24.4.193.21 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
   > 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > 0.0
  UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines > > >
   > > [...]

Content analysis details:   (5.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                            https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines