[ RadSafe ] Request an update on the NRC ruling based on SARI's recommendation.

[Parthasarathy K S]

Dear Dr Carl Marcus,

Recently,  the Center for Public Integrity reported that  the present NRC
may rule favorably to what you and others wanted in the "SARI petitions"

The link:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwBVqWvMPnnFRBbbSkGQjWDBgKq

Even with the support of best of science, final decision on risk -related
matters will depend on "judgement" of specialists followed by the support
of political decision makers. Unfortunately, the discourse on the effects
of radiation got colored by conspiracy theories, possible conflicts of
interests and other matters outside the realm of science.

Every one seems to ignore a crucial factor :  the importance of imparting
credible information. In the "no-holds-bar' controversies public had no
role. You advocated  using the media as a last resort to force an anti-LNT
decision ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102073/). I
believe that there is a consensus  that accurate effects (harmful or
beneficial) of  low level radiation are un-provable!

In an earlier message you stated  thus:

The NRC hasn't done squat.  It is 3 1/2 years, and they are still
"studying" it..

Do you believe that in the changed political environment,there will be some
light at the end of the tunnel favoring what SARI wants?
Cheers
Parthasarathy

<https://www.avast.com/en-in/recommend?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=default3&tag=17e2512d-bb90-4278-975f-adf9896691bf>
I’m
protected online with Avast Free Antivirus. Get it here — it’s free forever.
<https://www.avast.com/en-in/recommend?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=default3&tag=17e2512d-bb90-4278-975f-adf9896691bf>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:29 AM Carol Marcus <csmarcus at ucla.edu> wrote:

>
>
> The NRC hasn't done squat.  It is 3 1/2 years, and they are still
> "studying" it.
>
> Best, Carol
>
> On 9/9/2018 7:58 AM, Parthasarathy K S wrote:
> > Can any one in the list provide an update on the present status of NRC
> > ruilng based on the petition by SARI and others.
> >
> > Regards
> > Parthasarathy
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> > Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://health.phys.iit.edu
>


-- 
oiytrr