RE: Avoiding improper use of isotopes in the laboratory

["Perrero, Daren" <Perrero@idns.state.il.us>]

Sandy,

I think a major point of the discussion is found in your statement
"...assuming that all reasonable actions have been institutionalized...."

What is reasonable?

What actions are included in the assumption?

Is it reasonable to require all locations where radioactive materials are
used and stored to be locked when physically unattended? over a holiday
weekend? (sure) overnight? (probably)over lunch? (that a nuisance).  Given
that the examples are largely research or academic facilities, this request
may be too much to expect for the culture of the people involved and the
small amount of radioactive materials present. At the same time a
"reasonable" man on the street may expect nothing less and certainly much
more. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy Perle [mailto:sandyfl@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 1:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Avoiding improper use of isotopes in the laboratory


> Based on the frequency of these events (almost never) and the
> potential for serious injury (almost none), why would you waste even
> a second's thought on the subject? 

John is absolutely correct in his assessment. Considering frequency 
and risk, no further actions need be taken, assuming that all 
reasonable actions have been institutionalized through procedures and 
training. 


<snip>


dperrero@earthlink.net
Don't blame my employer, the thoughts are mine, all mine...
I'm with the government, I'm here to help you....
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html