[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Atomic Confession
Let's see...workers receiving even trivial doses have been
monitored since the Manhattan Project; vaults all over the country
have dose records going back to the fifties (I know, I've seen many
of them). And yet there is whole batch of highly exposed people
that nobody knew about? Oh, yes, and what about those studies
indicating that the subjects of this government experimentation are
'suffering' at the same rates and from the same aches and pains
that everyone else does?
And now this: the possibility raised that the report and
announcement could be...(gasp!)...POLITICALLY MOTIVATED!!! (Say it
isn't so, Joe!)
On a more serious note, it is becoming disturbing how flippantly
the media and political players are now referring to past exposures
as 'human experimentation' performed by the government (always
leading to current day suffering on vast scales, of course). These
are some nasty allegations that are going unchallenged. For
fairness to those in the historical health physics community whose
concern was for worker safety and health, it seems that some of us
who know better should try to set the record straight.
Vincent King
vincent.king@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Atomic Confession
Author: hoover@sip-pmu.slavutich.kiev.ua at Internet
Date: 2/9/00 2:09 AM
I won't comment on the accuracy of the report, but this sure seems
to me to be the result of a "leak" out of Richardson's office so
that he could come riding to the rescue of the wounded. You don't
think this could have anything to do with the elections do you?
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html