[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: FACTS ABOUT TENNESSEE ILLNESSES
Ed,
I love the part about DOE management and shotguns...:-)
However, there ARE lots of honest, caring, conscientous HPs in the DOE
complex, at least among the contractors. We're not all bad apples.
Having worked in the nuclear power industry for years, and then the
DOE complex, you are correct about the difference. When I first came
to the DOE from nuclear power, it was a culture shock almost as severe
as when I went from the Navy Nuclear Power program to the civilian
nuclear power program.
I may be in the minority, but I would welcome NRC regulation of the
DOE complex, at least for radiation protection matters. I've never
believed that any industry/agency can effectively regulate itself when
it also determines the funding, sets priorities, hires contractors to
do the work, etc.
I still have a problem, however, with comparing past practices from
decades ago at the height of the cold war with today's scientific
knowledge and regulations. It's an unfair comparison. Automobiles from
30 or 40 years ago were terribly unsafe compared to those of today,
but they met government safety standards. Why not compensate past car
crash victims because in hindsight the government obviously allowed
unsafe cars to be made and sold based on today's standards?
Steven D. Rima, CHP, CSP
Manager, Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene
MACTEC-ERS, LLC
steve.rima@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: FACTS ABOUT TENNESSEE ILLNESSES
Author: EASlavin@aol.com at Internet
Date: 4/6/00 2:27 PM
Dear Bill:
Thanks. The "arrogance of power" of the wannabees is also worsened by the
"webees" -- we were here yesterday and we''ll be here tomorrow.
People who would be fired in civilian nuclear powerplant operations get
promoted in DOE. Too many DOE managers are like the proverbial shotgun
without a firing pin -- they won't work and they can't be fired.
Too often, the DOE complex behaves like a boa constrictor, and puts its "arms
around" the civilian nuclear powerplant industry, treating y'all like puppets
on their string (or bullets in their gun). That's what they did on this
listserv with respect to the Tennessean series. They inflamed your
passions. That cooptation may be more devastating to nuclear power than TMI.
Don't think DOE is your pal. DOE is fighting to survive as an agency, and
it will do or say anything. (Like the farmer said to his grandson, "they're
rattlesnakes in there, and they're pitiless.")
Don't let the bomb builder management culture's unpopularity, misfeasance,
malfeasance and nonfeasance rub off on your profession. I find nuclear
powerplant operations much more safety conscious than DOE. IMHO NRC is much
more whistleblower conscious than DOE. The DNFSB is a joke and won't even
talk about generic problems, like whistleblower retaliation, as happened again
in Oak Ridge last night. In contrast, NRC tries to be proactive, even if its
fines are paltry and years late. It's a difference between trying and not
trying. DOE doesn't try.
Regards,
Ed Slavin
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html