[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple myeloma
please help me i don't know how but a thousands of
people are sending me mails from people that i don't
know please tell me what can i do for no recieve this
mails thanks.
--- "Johansen.Kjell" <Kjell.Johansen@wepco.com>
escribió:
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail
> reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be
> legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFA334.55061292
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> The first posting on this topic today indicated that
> only the radiation
> exposure could be quantified. Exposure to toxic
> chemicals and metals could
> not be quantified. Therefore, for the study to
> achieve the (desired?)
> result, radiation as the only cause paradigm had to
> be evoked. So, what
> other chemicals or metals could these workers have
> been exposed and have any
> of them been shown to cause the same type of cancer?
> Perhaps, radiation is
> only a surrogate, linked by occurrence but not by
> causal effect. If you
> can't quantify exposure to other potential
> initiators, ascribing the cancer
> solely to radiation is bogus and not credible. Have
> the authors considered
> synergistic effects? It seems to me that synergy
> among all of the other
> potential villans in the chemical/metal exposures
> should be considered. It
> is so easy to recite the "deady radiation" mantra
> because it ..(you can fill
> in the blank with your own favorite ending to this
> thought). I will wait
> further judgment until I can read the original
> article but I am becoming
> leary of all of these new discoveries out of NC.
> Didn't the same group
> reanalyze the ORNL workers a while back, say about 2
> - 3 years ago?
>
> Just my own thoughts
>
> Kjell A. Johansen
> Wisconsin Electric Power Company
> Milwaukee
> kjell.johansen@wepco.com
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFA334.55061292
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="ISO-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type"
> CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3DISO-8859-1">
> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange
> Server version =
> 5.5.2650.12">
> <TITLE>multiple myeloma</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">The first posting
> on this topic today =
> indicated that only the radiation exposure could be
> quantified. =
> Exposure to toxic chemicals and metals could not be
> quantified. =
> Therefore, for the study to achieve the (desired?)
> result, radiation as =
> the only cause paradigm had to be evoked. So,
> what other =
> chemicals or metals could these workers have been
> exposed and have any =
> of them been shown to cause the same type of
> cancer? Perhaps, =
> radiation is only a surrogate, linked by occurrence
> but not by causal =
> effect. If you can't quantify exposure to
> other potential =
> initiators, ascribing the cancer solely to radiation
> is bogus and not =
> credible. Have the authors considered
> synergistic effects? =
> It seems to me that synergy among all of the other
> potential villans in =
> the chemical/metal exposures should be
> considered. It is so easy =
> to recite the "deady radiation" mantra
> because it ..(you can =
> fill in the blank with your own favorite ending to
> this =
> thought). I will wait further judgment
> until I can read the =
> original article but I am becoming leary of all of
> these new =
> discoveries out of NC. Didn't the same group
> reanalyze the ORNL =
> workers a while back, say about 2 - 3 years
> ago?</FONT></P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Just my own
> thoughts</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Kjell A.
> Johansen</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Wisconsin Electric
> Power =
> Company</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Milwaukee</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2
> FACE=3D"Arial">kjell.johansen@wepco.com</FONT>
> </P>
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFA334.55061292--
>
************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list,
> archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at
> http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Obtenga su dirección de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com
en http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html