Re: Contributions to the historical record

["Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@hotmail.com>]

Jim, I don't mind the references you are giving but there are also some 
papers that point at higher relative effects at lower doses. This area is 
indeed very complex. Check out for instance the papers by Ehrenberg et al. 
from the early 1960:ies (mutation rates in plants) or P. Lambin, M. Joiner 
and others from around 1992 and on (and cell survival for some human cell 
lines). These papers seem convincing from a statistical point.

It would be nice to see a theory emerge where findings on a cell and 
molecular level are consistent with epidemiology.

Bjorn Cedervall   bcradsafers@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/bjorn_cedervall/
---------
>For those with some intellectual interest in the historical basis of >the 
>biology and science that contradicts the LNT, please see the >following 
>abstracts, and read the papers:

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html