RE: Critics Allege Infant Mortality Rate

["LANNI, MARC" <MLANNI@entergy.com>]

	Then, Yes I totally agree...and I did miss
something....on my way to the archives...grin

> Marc Lanni  <mailto: mlanni@entergy.com>
> Grand Gulf Nuclear Station - Health Physicist
> Entergy Operations
> mlanni@entergy.com
> Office:	(601) 437-6572
> Fax:         (601) 437-6573 
> Pager:	(601) 930-8904
> 


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Flood [mailto:bflood@SLAC.Stanford.EDU]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 2:38 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Critics Allege Infant Mortality Rate


>   Maybe I missed something earlier, but where would the mis-identification
>of K-40 with Sr-90 occur. I was under the impression that the K-40 has
>a very active gamma (about 1460 KeV) however, the Sr-90 is no where close.
>Even if you were to measure the Y-90 counterpart the energies are so far
>off, I don't know that you could really confuse the two? If Im off base
here let me know.

I may have made an assumption that might not be valid - I would expect that
Sr-90 would be evaluated using a beta analysis, since gamma would be
impractical (a chemical extraction would alter the Sr/Y relationship, and
the Y-90 photons are too few to rely on, anyway). I would also expect a
budget-constrained study that is looking for Sr-90 to use a gross beta
counting method and make an adjustment for K-40, which I assume could be
done from gamma spec results of the same sample.
============================
Bob Flood
Dosimetry Group Leader
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
bflood@slac.stanford.edu


************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html