[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Critics allege infant mortality rate
I understand there were some slight administrative mistakes. One peer
reviewer thought it was sent to him for "pear" review and set it under some
fruit. Another thought it was sent for "peel" review and set it out by the
compost heap. A third thought it had been sent for "beer" review and he has
not yet responed.
Don Kosloff dkosloff@ncweb.com
2910 Main St, Perry OH 44081
----- Original Message -----
From: Johansen.Kjell <Kjell.Johansen@wepco.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 12:54 PM
Subject: Critics allege infant mortality rate
> After reading the article and the criticisms of it, I wonder what sort of
> "peer" review the article was subjected to prior to publication.
>
> Kjell Johansen
> Wisconsin Electric Power Company
> Milwaukee
> kjell.johansen@wepco.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html