[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Another LANL fire article
Radsters,
I found this article last night:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/may2000/fire-m19.shtml
Please note I have no idea who this organization is or what it stands for,
I just found the article.
here is an excerpt:
<Snip>
Of particular concern is the possibility of radioactive contamination fr*m
damage to the Los Alamos National Laboratory. While
government
officials have assured the public that no radioactive
materials were
burned, many questions remain unanswered. The blaze
apparently did
not penetrate the reinforced concrete bunkers where
radioactive
materials are stored, but these structures are not the
only source of
possible radioactive contamination. The security of
other radioactive
materials in various dumps and waste sites is unclear.
Over the six decades of the lab's operation,
radioactivity has leaked in
unknown quantities into the water and vegetation
surrounding the facility.
In the vicinity of the lab there are thought to be
millions of cubic feet of
waste containing remnants of uranium, plutonium and
tritium. It is quite
possible that high winds from the wildfire sweeping
across radioactively
contaminated brush and soil could send bursts of
radiation into the air.
The smoke cloud rising fr*m the fire blew across New
Mexico and
several adjacent states, home to millions of people.
The government has been forced to admit that the
ferocity of the fire has
hindered them fr*m determining which waste sites were
actually burned
in the blaze. An independent monitoring system at the
lab fell silent during
two days of the fire, transmitting no data. Finally,
on Monday, May 15,
federal and state officials expanded air sampling,
allowing for
measurements of radioactivity within two hours. Tests
were also under
way to determine the presence of 100 different
chemical substances in
the air, with results to be made available within
three days, instead of the
usual week.
The Los Alamos fire raises serious questions about
governmental
regulation and safeguards. At present, there are no
permanent monitoring
systems at US nuclear storage sites to measure the
emission of
radioactivity, toxic chemicals and hydrocarbons in the
event of an
accident.
<SNIP>
Have a nice day,
Phil Egidi
ORNL/GJ
7pe@ornl.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html