Re: shipping violation?

[BLHamrick@aol.com]

In a message dated 06/08/2000 9:11:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
WDunn@intiso.com writes:

<< The violation of exceeding 2.2
 cpm/cm2 can apparently not be proven, hence would not require notification.
 I never said it was right or wrong to exceed 300 cm2 >>

Also, it would actually be the 22 dpm/cm^2 limit in question.  The package 
was from a pharmacy...Even if it was not Tc-99m, as was contained in the 
package, there would be nothing possessed or used at either licensee's 
facility to reasonably conclude there might be an alpha emitter contaminating 
the package.

Barbara L. Hamrick
BLHamrick@aol.com 
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html