Re: The UCS study on Nuclear Plant Risk Studies

["Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@cpcug.org>]

Jim Dukelow:

Excellent analysis!  I hope everyone on this list reads it.  I admire your
coolness in appraising UCS's outrageous statements and assumptions. You
responded factually, withholding emotion.

This is a real service.  We all should do more of this kind of work.  I'm
filing it in my "Scientific Misconduct" file.  This sort of report by UCS is
not a legitimate difference of opinion among scientists.  It's a deliberate
effort to mislead by using scientific misconduct.  Any pre-publication
reviewers of this document are complicit in the misdeed.

Thanks.

TR



************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html