RE: Envirocare -How to promote dialogue?

["Wilson, Richard" <Richard.Wilson@rfets.gov>]

Not to mention that it is highly unprofessional.
Thank you,
Rich Wilson
Just my opinion, and no one elses.



	-----Original Message-----
	From:	RadiumProj@cs.com [SMTP:RadiumProj@cs.com]
	Sent:	Tuesday, January 09, 2001 12:12 PM
	To:	Multiple recipients of list
	Subject:	Re: Envirocare -How to promote dialogue?

	In a message dated 1/9/01 7:00:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
	cmigliore@envirocareutah.com writes:

	> As many of you know, Envirocare is
	>  attempting to license for B + C wastes. You should have heard
some of the
	>  crap the activists said at the land use exemption hearing in Salt
Lake.
	>  Gofman was quoted frequently.

	Radsafe:
	While this board is mainly made up of health physics
"professionals", some of 
	whom might even feel some small degree of agreement with the
sentiment borne 
	of frustration noted above by Mr. Migliore of Envirocare, I suggest
the use 
	of language of this type is foolish, counterproductive, and even
alienating 
	to many of the audiences we might be trying to reach. The
journalists, 
	writers, and even antinuclear activists who read Radsafe at times
can only 
	tend to feel distanced from information expressed on Radsafe that
does not 
	jive with their world view if they feel the Health Physics community
holds 
	their views in such contempt.

	Stewart Farber
	Public Health Sciences
	email: SAFarberMSPH@cs.com

	 
	
************************************************************************
	The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and
subscription
	information can be accessed at
http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html