Re: Who are you WITH? Re(3)($$): facility decommissioning question

[DWhitfil@KDHE.STATE.KS.US]

Another interesting quote is found in Eisenbud's 4th edition of

Environmental Radioactivity (1997):



A cursory review of the legal and technical facts contained in many of the

basic U.S. radiation protection standards suggests that the standards are

numerous and complex, principally control activities that make relatively

small contributions to the overall U.S. population doses, have become more

restrictive over time, and follow no common rationale in achieving public

health objectives.



The reference given for this little snippet is from the Compendium of Major

U.S. Radiation Protection Standards and Guides: Legal Technical Facts, by

W.A. Mills et al., ORNL 1988.







                                                                                                                             

                    Emil Murat                                                                                               

                    <kerrembaev@YAHOO.COM>         To:     radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu                                       

                    Sent by:                       cc:     muckerheide@MEDIAONE.NET                                          

                    owner-radsafe@list.vand        Subject:     Who are you WITH? Re(3)($$): facility decommissioning        

                    erbilt.edu                     question                                                                  

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             

                    03/26/01 09:28 PM                                                                                        

                    Please respond to Emil                                                                                   

                    Murat                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             









Greetings,



Jim and John Doe #....,



You are absolutely right about they and we!



To me, it does not really matter if I am correct or

incorrect in this particular instance.

You know the Health Physics as "science" reserves many

ways to solve the problem and Tim just needs to have

his job done.

Job is job.

I offered an advice.



Nevertheless,



You have raised an interesting question.

Quote:

- -------------------------------------

 "Then when the "rad protectionists," ICRP/NRPB

(as with NCRP/EPA/NRC/DOE in the US) change

regulations again, many more

thousands of very profitable hours and millions of $

(EUs) can keep the

funds for rad protection flowing, including many good

meetings and

conferences in nice locations, for more generations!!"

- ---------------------------------------

We y'all know that!



<Rest of thread snipped to conserve bandwidth>

__________________________________________________









************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------