[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

U.S. nuke regulators prepare for new plant applications



Index:



U.S. nuke regulators prepare for new plant applications

Energy Department Reviews Uranium

Eurotech Announces First EKOR Contracts in the Nuclear Waste Industry

Britain's Trident nuclear subs are legal - court

Kobe waives non-nuclear port-call condition for Italian ship

Nuclear leaders to meet in SF

======================================



U.S. nuke regulators prepare for new plant applications

 

WASHINGTON, March 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission on Friday said it is forming a "future licensing project 

organization" to prepare and manage possible applications to permit 

construction of new nuclear reactors. 



"Several utilities and organizations have contacted the NRC to initiate 

discussions associated with possible construction of a new nuclear plants 

in the United States," the NRC said. 



"These include Exelon's <EXC.N> request for a pre-application review of a 

Pebble Bed Modular Reactor and Exelon's stated intentions to submit an 

application to build the Pebble Bed Reactor." 



No commercial nuclear power plant has been built in the United States in 

25 years. Though nuclear supplies around 20 percent of the nation's 

electricity needs, it is only now, with a new Republican White House and 

an emerging energy crisis that the industry has seriously explored building 

new plants. 



The NRC said it intends to staff the new organization in phases with the 

objective of having a fully functional office by the end of September. 

- ----------------



Energy Department Reviews Uranium



WASHINGTON (AP) - The Energy Department says it could take two more 

years to determine how much recycled uranium - which contains traces of 

plutonium and other radioactive materials - passed through its nuclear 

facilities. 



The agency released a preliminary review Thursday analyzing the flow of 

recycled uranium throughout the DOE sites between 1952 and 1999. The 

agency was unable to complete a final analysis due to ``significant 

inconsistency and inherent uncertainty'' in the data it gathered from 12 

facilities at nine sites. 



The investigation began in 1999, prompted by concerns that workers were 

unknowingly exposed to high levels of radiation at uranium enrichment 

plants in Paducah, Ky.; Piketon, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, Tenn. 



The Energy Department used uranium in nuclear weapons and as fuel for 

reactors. The agency began recycling it in the early 1950s to reduce U.S. 

dependence on foreign uranium. The report said most Energy Department 

facilities stopped using recycled uranium in the late 1960s. 



Recycled uranium is more harmful than mined uranium because it has been 

processed in a reactor, where it becomes contaminated with plutonium and 

neptunium. 



Pete Dessaules, a team leader in DOE's Office of Plutonium, Uranium and 

Special Materials Inventory, said an overall assessment of the 12 facilities 

will help determine exactly how much recycled uranium was used over the 

years and how much may still be stored around the country. 



However, the task is proving more difficult than expected, Dessaules said. 



``The biggest challenge in completing the report is standardizing the 

definitions that were used in the site reports for recycled uranium,'' he said. 

``That may involve looking at millions of records.'' 



According to DOE, recycled uranium was present at the following locations: 

Hanford, Wash.; Savannah River, S.C.; Idaho National Engineering and 

Environmental Lab, Idaho; Fernald, Ohio; West Valley, N.Y.; Weldon 

Springs, Mo.; RMI Inc., Ohio; the gaseous diffusion plants in Paducah, 

Piketon and Oak Ridge; the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge; and Rocky Flats, 

Colo. 

- -----------------



Eurotech Announces First EKOR Contracts in the Nuclear Waste Industry

  

FAIRFAX, Va., March 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Eurotech Ltd., (Amex: EUO) 

announced today that they have reached a significant corporate milestone, 

securing the first two contracts for its leading product, the radiation-

resistant EKOR family of silicone geocomposites.  The sales are the result 

of recent marketing including industry presentations and demonstrations, 

which highlight the broad spectrum of applications for EKOR products.  The 

customer's objective in the first contract is to evaluate the performance of 

EKOR Matrix, mixed with low-level radioactive waste to create a waste form 

suitable for disposal.  The second contract is for EKOR Sealer where the 

customer's objective is to evaluate EKOR's performance in preventing the 

migration of radioactive contaminants on equipment used in the production 

of radioactive materials. 



The Company's penetration into the nuclear waste management market 

with the EKOR line of products will be established in stages through a 

series of scaled applications, ranging from proof of principle demonstrations 

to small projects and then larger projects as each application is proven in 

the field. The Company's strategy is to build long-term market penetration 

and credibility through product performance and successful application. 



EKOR is a unique family of ultra long life products that provide significant 

performance benefits such as extreme resistance to radiation damage, 

resistance to a broad range of chemical environments and outstanding 

barrier properties that were previously not available.  The EKOR family of 

products addresses a broad spectrum of applications where its multiple 

forms can be used as sealers, coatings, and waste encapsulation 

matrices, or foamed into cavities to control airborne contamination.  Current 

forms of the product family include EKOR Sealer, EKOR Coating, EKOR 

Grout, EKOR Matrix and EKOR Foam. 



"While the initial EKOR sales will demonstrate proof of principle and have 

modest dollar values, these early sales are important milestones, as they 

represent necessary steps to full deployment of EKOR at Department of 

Energy sites," stated Don Hahnfeldt, Eurotech's CEO and President.  

Hahnfeldt went on to say, "More importantly, our recent activity over the 

last month including the variety of EKOR product presentations made to 

key waste management contractors, represents the groundwork for future 

growth and sales.  Examples include field presentations of EKOR Matrix 

and EKOR Sealer at multiple sites. EKOR is following required industry 

protocol to prove the product and application effectiveness." 



"Once we have a few on-site applications, we can build on that momentum 

and success.  We expect several more contracts to follow shortly," said 

Paul Childress, General Manager, Nuclear Environmental Division. 



EUROTECH, Ltd. (Amex: EUO) works with scientists and research 

institutes in Russia, Israel and other countries to develop and 

commercialize innovative technologies that have widespread or critical 

application.  For photographs of EKOR applications inside Chernobyl's 

sarcophagus and additional information about Eurotech and its 

technologies visit http://www.eurotechltd.com. 

- ----------------



Britain's Trident nuclear subs are legal - court

  

LONDON, March 30 (Reuters) - A Scottish court ruled on Friday that 

Britain's Trident nuclear submarines were legal under international law, 

despite claims to the contrary by an anti-nuclear campaign group. 



The court overturned an earlier ruling that three women who damaged a 

Trident nuclear installation two years ago had acted lawfully because 

nuclear weapons were illegal in the eyes of the International Court of 

Justice in The Hague. 



The three protesters were members of the Trident Ploughshares group 

which argues that the nuclear weapons aboard Britain's four Trident 

submarines are illegal because they cannot distinguish between military 

and civilian targets. 



Since the darkest days of the Cold War there has always been one Trident 

submarine on patrol at sea, its missiles at the ready. 



"Until Trident is taken off alert, we have a direct action campaign to 

continue. Today'sjudgement will actually strenghten campaigners in their 

resolve," David Mackenzie, a spokesman for the campaign group told 

Reuters. 



"The government is doing nothing about this crime, the courts today have 

said they're not prepared to do anything in Scotland, so it's back to us to 

get on with the job," he said. 

- ---------------



Kobe waives non-nuclear port-call condition for Italian ship



KOBE, March 31 (Kyodo) - The city of Kobe has decided not to ask an 

Italian navy ship to submit a document stating it does not possess nuclear 

weapons or materials as required under a city ordinance when it makes a 

port call Monday, city officials said Saturday. 



The 52.9-ton Orsa Maggiore is an unarmed training vessel and therefore not 

subject to non-nuclear port-call regulations, the officials said, adding that 

the waiver does not mean the city has abandoned the requirement. 



The Orsa Maggiore is expected to stay at the port until April 10 for refueling 

and allowing its crew to rest. The ship had taken part in various events in 

Tokyo and other cities. 



The western Japan port city has refused to allow foreign ships to make port 

calls unless they submit a document proving they are not carrying nuclear 

weapons and materials. 

- ---------------



Nuclear leaders to meet in SF

SAN FRANCISCO, (CBS.MW) -- As California's energy crisis deepens with 

no foreseeable solution in sight, nuclear energy advocates are set to bring 

their suggestions to the Golden State. 

Next week, The Nuclear Energy Institute, a Washington-based policy 

organization, will hold its annual three-day forum to discuss the economic 

potential, business risks and environmental implications of nuclear power. 

Although it provides about 20 percent of U.S. electricity, nuclear energy is 

largely considered anathema in the United States, and especially in 

politically correct San Francisco.

But with rolling blackouts hitting California and little hope the state will 

resolve its energy shortage anytime soon, proponents of nuclear power are 

at least hopeful of consideration.

Vice President Dick Chaney, who is leading development of the Bush 

administration's energy policy, has said that nuclear energy deserves 

serious consideration as part of the solution to the nation's developing 

energy shortage.

Among other reasons, the vice president has supported nuclear energy as 

one possible way to lower carbon dioxide emissions. Earlier this week, 

President Bush retreated from the Kyoto Protocol, an international 

agreement to limit carbon dioxide and other gasses believed to contribute 

to global warming, because it did not hold emerging nations to similar 

standards.

Nuclear plants don't emit carbon dioxide, while coal generation, which still 

accounts for about 50 percent of U.S. electrical consumption, generates 

large amounts of the gas.

Environmentalists find fault with the logic of using nuclear energy to reduce 

gas emissions. The potential biological impacts and public safety concerns 

surrounding nuclear energy remain tremendous, with long-term effects of 

radiation and waste storage still unpredictable and not fully understood, 

they argue. 

"From the global warning problem, its probably a net plus," says Rich 

Ferguson, director of research for the Sacramento-based Center for Energy 

Efficiency and Renewable Technologies. "But my general reaction is, when 

the politicians are proposing to put one of these plants in their own 

hometown, I'll take them seriously."

The political challenges surrounding nuclear power were demonstrated 

again this week in Europe where Green party protestors in Germany sought 

to delay a shipment of nuclear waste to a processing plant by blocking a 

train carrying the material. 

And the memories of the 1979 Three Mile Island meltdown in Pennsylvania 

and the Soviet Union's Chernobyl disaster, have served to deter much 

consideration of nuclear power development, at least in the United States.

Currently, there are two operating power plants in California. PG&E ({HYPERLINK "/tools/quotes/intChart.asp?siteid=aolpf&symb=PCG"}PCG) 

owns the Diablo Canyon Power Plant near San Luis Obispo. Southern 

California Edison ({HYPERLINK "/tools/quotes/intChart.asp?siteid=aolpf&symb=EIX"}EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric ({HYPERLINK "/tools/quotes/intChart.asp?siteid=aolpf&symb=SRE"}SRE) own the San 

Onofre plant roughly midway between San Diego and Los Angeles. 

Combined, nuclear energy produces 14 percent of the state's electricity 

needs.

In the U.S., 103 nuclear reactors operate in 31 states, generating about 20 

percent of the country's energy needs. Since 1975, no permits to build 

nuclear plants have been issued in the U.S.





**************************************************************************

Sandy Perle                                     Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100                                     

Director, Technical                             Extension 2306                                  

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service         Fax:(714) 668-3149                                          

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                       E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net                                                      

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue           E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com                       

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------