RE: Oak Ridge Associated Universities - news & updates

["Ted Rockwell" <tedrock@CPCUG.ORG>]

>EPA goes to some pains to justify use of the LNT model for its risk

assessments. Comments they received on the proposed rule are answered in a

general manner.



Susan et al:



That's why RSH has taken EPA to court, arguing that its use of LNT is

contrary to "the best peer-reviewed science" that EPA is required by law to

follow.  We've submitted a massive amount of scientific evidence.  Courts

have ruled against EPA on similar cases (not involving radiation).  It will

be a long hassle, but it's time it was done.



An unbiased public finding that use of LNT to claim hazard from low-dose

radiation is not valid science would be expected to have a world-wide impact

on radiation protection.



Ted Rockwell



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------