[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

radsafe-digest V1 #30





radsafe-digest         Tuesday, April 10 2001         Volume 01 : Number 030







In this issue:



    Re: question about Vatican broadcasting

    Device enquiry

    Re: Device enquiry

    Re: Radon Web Site

    radon measurement and mitigation at universities

    Classic books - Part 3

    Radioactive Tumbleweeds

    Survey monitor for Nuclear Medicine

    DOE Transuranic Waste Definition

    Neutron Shielding Materials

    Calls on Nuclear Industry to Abandon Use Of Plutonium, Highly Enriched Uranium

    RE: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut

    FPL Executives Keep Merger Bonuses

    Natural Radiations in Hawai'i

    RE: two purposes

    I need contacts for Inst.

    RE: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut

    Re: I need contacts for Inst.

    RE: two purposes

    Re:  question about Vatican broadcasting

    Water whirlers etc

    Survey Monitors



----------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:29:32 +1200

From: andrew_mcewan@NRL.MOH.GOVT.NZ

Subject: Re: question about Vatican broadcasting



Ruth Weiner asked about the relationship between volts per metre and power flux density for RF radiation.



The power flux density in the far field varies as E squared, with E in volts per metre.  For the frequency range 10-400 MHz the International

Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection recommends a public exposure (CW) limit of 28 V/m corresponding to a power flux density of 2 W/sq m.

I don't know the frequency of the Vatican transmitter, however, for frequencies below around 10 MHz E and H field strengths generally both need to be

determined for compliance with limits, and limits in W/sq m are not applicable.  For an AM transmitter around 1 MHz the public exposure limit is 87

V/m, and close to such transmitters the E field is dominant.



Andrew McEwan

____________________________

Andrew C McEwan PhD

National Radiation Laboratory

PO Box 25-099

Christchurch, New Zealand



Ph 64 3 366 5059

Fax 64 3 366 1156

Andrew_McEwan@nrl.moh.govt.nz



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:26:18 +0800 

From: "Dahlskog, Leif" <Leif.Dahlskog@HEALTH.WA.GOV.AU>

Subject: Device enquiry



Dear Colleagues



I am looking for information about the following moisture measuring devices.

The information I have is as follows:-



Manufacturer : VIATEC Ltd, Div. Of Plessy, Inc

Model : PW23 Depth Probe Model DP1

Serial No. : 11

Contents : Am241/Be (activity unknown), June 1969



The above has a central rod about 1.5 inches diameter and maybe 4 ft long

surrounded by a green metal cylinder (shield).  From surveys it appears the

source is located half way along the rod.



Accompanying the above is another smaller hand operated device with a lever

operated shutter. This one is labelled:-



Manufacturer : VIATEC Ltd, Div. Of Plessy, Inc

Model	: HDM2, Surface Probe

Serial No. : 171

Contents : 10 mCi (370 MBq) of 226Ra/Be, June 1968



I would be most grateful on any further information about the devices you

may have or who I may contact in seeking the information.  Of particular

interest would be the activity of Am-241/Be in the PW23 Depth Probe and

details about the source manufacture and shielding materials for both

devices (source encapsulation, chemical form, any special form certificates

issued etc).  One retired staff member recalls that mercury may have been

used as the shielding material used in the Surface Probe.  We have no plans

of opening it up but would like to confirm the mercury part.  I have digital

photographs of the devices that can be sent to anyone interested.



Anyone able have any further info ?



regards



Leif Dahlskog 

Radiation Health Section 

Health Department of Western Australia 

ph  (+61 8) 9346 2260 

fax (+61 8) 9381 1423 

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 06:47:42 -0500

From: "Robert Young" <ryoung3@MAIL.STATE.TN.US>

Subject: Re: Device enquiry



- --=_560DB074.2A4BED9D

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Content-Disposition: inline



The NRC's State Programs www page has the following Sealed Source & Device =

Registry sheet on a VIATEC Ltd, Div. Of Plessy, Inc device, however, the =

Isotope was Ra226/Be in stead of Am241/Be. The review is coded as an =

Inactive SSD model number.



http://www.hsrd.ornl.gov/nrc/ssdr/09480801.pdf



This might be a start. The Company is out of South Africa.







Robert N. Young, X-ray Registration & Machine / Device Permitting Manager



TN - Division of Radiological Health

3rd Floor, L & C Annex

401 Church Street

Nashville, TN 37243-1532



(615) 532-0364 Voice

(615) 532-0385 FAX

e-mail: ryoung3@mail.state.tn.us



>>> "Dahlskog, Leif" <Leif.Dahlskog@HEALTH.WA.GOV.AU> 4/9/01 12:26:18 AM =

>>>

Dear Colleagues



I am looking for information about the following moisture measuring =

devices.

The information I have is as follows:-



Manufacturer : VIATEC Ltd, Div. Of Plessy, Inc

Model : PW23 Depth Probe Model DP1

Serial No. : 11

Contents : Am241/Be (activity unknown), June 1969



The above has a central rod about 1.5 inches diameter and maybe 4 ft long

surrounded by a green metal cylinder (shield).  From surveys it appears =

the

source is located half way along the rod.



Accompanying the above is another smaller hand operated device with a =

lever

operated shutter. This one is labelled:-



Manufacturer : VIATEC Ltd, Div. Of Plessy, Inc

Model	: HDM2, Surface Probe

Serial No. : 171

Contents : 10 mCi (370 MBq) of 226Ra/Be, June 1968



I would be most grateful on any further information about the devices you

may have or who I may contact in seeking the information.  Of particular

interest would be the activity of Am-241/Be in the PW23 Depth Probe and

details about the source manufacture and shielding materials for both

devices (source encapsulation, chemical form, any special form certificates=



issued etc).  One retired staff member recalls that mercury may have been

used as the shielding material used in the Surface Probe.  We have no =

plans

of opening it up but would like to confirm the mercury part.  I have =

digital

photographs of the devices that can be sent to anyone interested.



Anyone able have any further info ?



regards



Leif Dahlskog=20

Radiation Health Section=20

Health Department of Western Australia=20

ph  (+61 8) 9346 2260=20

fax (+61 8) 9381 1423=20

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.







- --=_560DB074.2A4BED9D

Content-Type: text/plain

Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Robert Young.vcf"



BEGIN:VCARD

VERSION:2.1

X-GWTYPE:USER

FN:Young, Robert

TEL;WORK:615-532-0384

ORG:;TDEC-DRH

TEL;PREF;FAX:615-532-0385

EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:BG32015.1909S01.sd07

N:Young;Robert

TITLE:Health Physicist Supervisor II

X-GWUSERID:BG32015

END:VCARD





- --=_560DB074.2A4BED9D--

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 06:35:16 -0600

From: "Raymond A. Hoover" <rayhoover@HOTMAIL.COM>

Subject: Re: Radon Web Site



Both radioactive decay and pressure contribute (I no longer remember the 

percentages) and I seem to recall that without such heating we would be 

about 50 degrees F cooler (on average) without them.





>From: "Phil Hypes" <laradcon@HOTMAIL.COM>

>Reply-To: "Phil Hypes" <laradcon@HOTMAIL.COM>

>To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

>Subject: Re: Radon Web Site

>Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 09:00:13 -0600

>

>I like this quote even better:  "Radon is produced by the natural breakdown

>of radioactive heavy metals dispersed throughout the earth's crust. (fine 

>so

>far, but read on and learn!) This spontaneous fission makes life on earth

>possible - it heats the earth's core."

>

>I always thought that pressure heated the earth's core.  Also, how much 

>does

>life on earth depend on geothermal heating?  Is life on earth really

>dependent on heat from the core?

>

>For those of you who haven't looked at the site, it's selling concrete

>sealant.

>

>Phil

>laradcon@hotmail.com

>

>

>>Found the following web site regarding radon gas in homes.  Could someone

>>in this group verify his statements.

>>

>>

>>http://www.radonseal.com/radon-indoor.htm

>>

>>David Norman

>>Norm-Rad Services

>

>_________________________________________________________________

>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

>

>************************************************************************

>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

>send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

>radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>



_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:02:20 -0500

From: "Danny Anglin" <danny.anglin@VANDERBILT.EDU>

Subject: radon measurement and mitigation at universities



The director of my department has asked that I conduct a poll of radsafe

members at universities concerning radon programs for resident halls and in

the workplace.  Could you respond to the following:



1. Do you have a program to measure and mitigate radon?  If not, why not.

2. If so, do you make measurements in resident halls?

3. For resident halls, do you use a guideline other than the EPA limit of 4

pCi/l for Rn-222. (e.g., NCRP-91 guideline of 2 WLM per year or about 8

pCi/l).

4. For the workplace do you use EPA guidelines or occupational limits as

defined by OSHA. (We have a consultant that has recommended that

concentrations of less than 7.5 pCi/l (Rn-222) averaged over one year need

not be mitigated.  He based it on the definition of airborne radioactivity

area in the OSHA standard.  My understanding is that 10 CFR regulations in

effect in 1971 still apply under OSHA regulations).



Please respond to me at my email address.

- ----------------------------------------

Danny Anglin, Radiation Safety Officer

Vanderbilt Environmental Health & Safety

Danny.anglin@vanderbilt.edu

Phone:  615-343-0761

Fax:  615-343-4951

Email:  danny.anglin@vanderbilt.edu

U-0211 MCN

1161 21st Ave. S.

Nashville, TN 37232-2665

www.safety.vanderbilt.edu





- ----------------------------------------



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:25:06 -0500 

From: gerald.lahti@EXELONCORP.COM

Subject: Classic books - Part 3



> Classics - part 3 - here's the last for a while.  These are the "heavy"

> tomes. - for sale or appropriate donation 

> 

> Radsafers, I'm moving and need to get rid of a few things.  I have a

> number of classic texts which I think are too good to throw out.  Is

> anybody interested in purchasing these?  Or can anybody offer a worthy

> home for donation purposes?  

> 

> * * *

> 

1. LV Spencer, AB Chilton and CM Eisenhauer, Structural Shielding Against

Fallout Gamma Rays From Nuclear Detonations, NBS Special Publication 570,

1980.

This book is 8-1/2 x 11 inches in size, hard cover, of course.  While its

984 pages address mostly the subject matter of the title, the book also

contains a good deal of fundamental shielding info.  $20 including shipping.



2. Darryl Randerson (editor), Atmospheric Science and Power Plant

Production, DOE/TIC 27601, 1984.  This (heavy) tome is also 8-1/2 x 11

inches in size and hard cover.    Its 850 pages were intended to supercede

the older AEC document, Meteorology and Atomic Energy - 1968.  $30 including

shipping.



3. Knoll - Radiation Detection and Measurement (1979 edition) 816 pages $30

including shipping.





> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

> Jerry Lahti

> Exelon - Nuclear

> 1400 Opus Place, Suite 400

> Downers Grove, IL 60515

> Phone - 630.663.6659

> Fax: -    630.663.7199

> Email -  gerald.lahti@exeloncorp.com

> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

> 





*********************************************************************************

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corp. proprietary

information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright 

belonging to the  Exelon Corp. family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended

solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If

you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified

that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation

to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited

and may be unlawful.  If you have received this E-mail in error, please

notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and

any copy of this E-mail and any printout.  Thank You.

*********************************************************************************

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:35:04 EDT

From: BobCherry@AOL.COM

Subject: Radioactive Tumbleweeds



http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/04/06/radioactive.tumbleweeds.ap/index.ht



ml?s=3



bobcherry@aol.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:05:16 +0500 

From: "ishtiaq.hussain" <ishtiaq.hussain@AKU.EDU>

Subject: Survey monitor for Nuclear Medicine



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C0FE.1A7FE770

Content-Type: text/plain;

	charset="iso-8859-1"



Dear fellows,

May I request some experiences on the survey monitors for gamma/beta

radiation commonly used in Nuclear Medicine.

Please provide me the manufacturers name and contact email if possible.

On my list I have victoreen 190F with GM probe.

Is there any other better more sensitive for multiple radiation environment

in the market?

Regards\

Hunzaie



- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C0FE.1A7FE770

Content-Type: text/html;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =

charset=3Diso-8859-1">

<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =

5.5.2653.12">

<TITLE>Survey monitor for Nuclear Medicine</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Dear fellows,</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">May I request some experiences on the =

survey monitors for gamma/beta radiation commonly used in Nuclear =

Medicine.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Please provide me the manufacturers =

name and contact email if possible.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">On my list I have victoreen 190F with =

GM probe.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Is there any other better more =

sensitive for multiple radiation environment in the market?</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Regards\</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Hunzaie</FONT>

</P>



</BODY>

</HTML>

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C0FE.1A7FE770--

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:30:26 -0700

From: "Le, Quang" <quangle@SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>

Subject: DOE Transuranic Waste Definition



Ladies and gentlemen,



DOE Order 435.1 definition of transuranic waste says:

"Transuranic waste is radioactive waste containing more than 100 nCi of alpha-emitting transuranic isotopes per gram of waste, with half-lives greater than 20 years, except for:

1) High-level waste

2) Waste that the Secretary of Energy has determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator of the EPA, does not need the degree of isolation required by the 40CFR Part 191 disposal regulations; or

3) Waste that the NRC has approved for disposal on a case-by-case basis in accordance with 10 CFR 61."



Questions:

Is there a list of the wastes mentioned in 2) and 3) above?



Any info you can provide would be greatly appreciated.



Thank you.



Quang Le

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Operational Health Physics Department

<quangle@slac.stanford.edu>

(650)926-2610

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:36:19 -0400

From: stallsmi@GDLS.COM

Subject: Neutron Shielding Materials



Good Morning RadSafers:



I am interested in reducing a 1E12 neutron fluence (1 Mev spectra) from a

nuclear weapon by a factor of one-fifth to one-tenth.   What are the best

neutron shielding materials that could be used?  Space claim of the shield

is an important consideration in evaluating potential materials.  In

addition, the shielding of the gammas produced by neutron capture may not

be a problem for the application in question.



Any advice or references would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance.



Dennis G. Stallsmith

Engineering Specialist

Electromagnetic Effects/Radiation Safety

General Dynamics Land Systems

38500 Mound Rd.

MZ : 436-10-70

Sterling Heights, Michigan  48310

(810) 825-5767

stallsmi@gdls.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:47:44 -0700

From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

Subject: Calls on Nuclear Industry to Abandon Use Of Plutonium, Highly Enriched Uranium



Index:



Calls to Abandon Use Of Plutonium, Highly Enriched Uranium

Japan town decides no more U.S. nuke sub visits

Hundreds Rally Against Nuke Weapons

Nuclear Waste Protested in Germany

Union supports Greenpeace nuclear disaster campaign

Tokaimura residents undergo health checks following accident

US Agency May Preserve Birthplaces of Atom Bomb, NYT Says

Senator: Benefit Program Not Moving

==========================================



Nuclear Control Institute Calls on Nuclear Industry to Abandon Use Of 

Plutonium, Highly Enriched Uranium

  

WASHINGTON, April 9 /PRNewswire/ -- The Nuclear Control Institute 

today called on the nuclear industry to either abandon the use of 

plutonium and highly enriched uranium or be prepared to phase out 

nuclear power altogether. 



Speaking at NCI's 20th anniversary conference at the Carnegie 

Endowment for International Peace, NCI President Paul Leventhal said: 

 "There may be an irreducible proliferation risk associated with 

nuclear power, a risk serious enough to consider abandoning our 

commitment to nuclear power." 



Leventhal said:  "If the nuclear industry refuses to end its love 

affair with plutonium, then the world may well be better off without 

nuclear power, and should look to alternative sources of energy and 

to energy conservation and efficiency measures.  There is an 

abundance of cheap, non-weapons usable uranium available, so 

plutonium and highly enriched uranium are unnecessary," Leventhal 

said. 



Leventhal said that NCI's opposition to civilian use of plutonium and 

highly enriched uranium does not mean that the organization is anti-

nuclear. "We have worked for 20 years to de-link nuclear power and 

nuclear weapons by questioning the use of plutonium produced in 

nuclear power reactors and by seeking a halt in commerce in plutonium 

as well as bomb-grade uranium.  The issue is more critical today than 

at any time in the past 20 years." 



NCI convened today's conference -- "Nuclear Power and the Spread of 

Nuclear Weapons" -- to underscore the connection that exists between 

nuclear power and the proliferation of nuclear weapons.  The 

conference took place amid growing concerns over the nation's 

electricity-supply shortages, the threat of global warming and the 

threat of nuclear proliferation.  Some have argued that nuclear power 

provides an answer to the perceived energy crisis and the threat of 

global warning.  NCI's Leventhal took strong exception to this 

argument. 



Among those addressing today's conference were U.S. Rep. Edward 

Markey (D-MA); former U.S. Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary; Ambassador 

Robert Gallucci, Dean of the Georgetown School of Foreign Service and 

diplomatic troubleshooter on North Korean, Iraqi and Iranian nuclear 

weapons issues; Richard Rhodes, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of "The 

Making of the Atomic Bomb;" and Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain 

Institute, advocate for the "soft energy" path energy of conservation 

and energy efficiency rather than nuclear power.  Today's full 

conference program is available at www.nci.org/conference.htm . 



About the Nuclear Control Institute   



Founded in 1981, the Nuclear Control Institute (NCI) is an 

independent research and advocacy center specializing in problems of 

nuclear proliferation.  Non-partisan and non-profit, NCI monitors 

nuclear activities worldwide and pursues strategies to halt the 

spread and reverse the growth of nuclear weapons.  NCI focuses in 

particular on the urgency of eliminating atom-bomb materials -- 

plutonium and highly enriched uranium -- from civilian nuclear power 

and research programs.  Further information about NCI is available on 

the organization's Web site, www.nci.org . 

- ---------------



Japan town decides no more U.S. nuke sub visits

  

TOKYO, April 9 (Reuters) - A town on the southern Japanese island of 

Okinawa adopted on Monday a resolution opposing port calls by U.S. 

nuclear submarines to an adjacent U.S. military port, Kyodo news 

agency reported. 



"A series of scandals caused by U.S. submarines, such as the 

collision in waters off Hawaii and the unannounced port call by 

another U.S. sub to Sasebo port, is truly regrettable," Kyodo quoted 

the resolution adopted by the Katsuren town assembly as saying. 



"We strongly urge the Japanese government not to allow any of such 

nuclear-powered submarines to enter Japanese ports." 



Last week, an unexpected visit by the USS Chicago to the port of 

Sasebo in southern Japan outraged local authorities, who said it 

violated a 1964 agreement and prompted Foreign Minister Yohei Kono to 

demand an explanation before allowing further port calls. 



U.S.-Japan ties have already been frayed by the accidental sinking of 

a Japanese training trawler by a U.S. nuclear submarine off Hawaii in 

February, killing nine people, and by a series of alleged crimes by 

U.S. military personnel stationed in Japan. Many are stationed on 

Okinawa. 



Last Thursday, just days after the visit by the USS Chicago, a 

different U.S. nuclear submarine, the USS Los Angeles, made a port 

call at a U.S. Naval port in Katsuren town, although Japanese Foreign 

Ministry officials said, unlike the Sasebo case, local officials had 

been notified prior to its arrival. 



Tokyo and Washington have agreed to start talks to come up with 

procedures as soon as possible to prevent notification failures in 

the future. 



Under the 1964 agreement, the U.S. government is required to notify 

Japan at least 24 hours before a port call by its nuclear-powered 

vessels. 



U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell expressed his regrets over USS 

Chicago's surprise entry in a telephone conversation with Kono. 



Japan's parliament enacted new defence guidelines in 1999 authorising 

Tokyo to provide logistical support to the U.S. military in the event 

of an emergency in the region, but many local governments are 

sensitive to the possibility that their authority could be infringed 

in such cases. 



A series of criminal incidents involving the U.S. military on Okinawa 

has angered citizens of the southern island, which has less than one 

percent of Japan's land area but is home to 25,000 U.S. troops -- 

just over a quarter of the total U.S. military presence in the Asia-

Pacific. 

- --------------



Hundreds Rally Against Nuke Weapons

 

OAK RIDGE, Tenn. (AP) - About 300 people demonstrated Sunday at the 

Department of Energy's Oak Ridge nuclear weapons plant, and police 

made about 30 arrests, most on trespassing charges. 



Demonstrators have targeted the plant in semiannual protests since 

1998. Another protest is planned Aug. 6, the anniversary of the 

dropping of the first atomic bomb on Japan. The bomb was developed in 

part at Oak Ridge. 



Most of the demonstration was held outside the perimeter of the 

plant, but police said those arrested went beyond a ``no cross'' 

zone. All but one of the protesters were released immediately. 



The Y-12 plant manufactures parts for the MX missile system and 

stores highly enriched uranium used in warheads. 

- -------------



Nuclear Waste Protested in Germany



STUTTGART, Germany (AP) Apr 8 - About 900 people demonstrated at two 

sites in Germany on Sunday to protest expected shipments of spent 

nuclear fuel. 



Outside the Gorleben nuclear waste dump in northern Germany, about 

400 people piled hundreds of sandbags at the entrance to the dump as 

a symbolic ``radiation protection wall,'' police said. 



Another 500 people staged a peaceful demonstration in Philippsburg, 

site of a German nuclear plant. Anti-nuclear groups say the plant is 

one of three from which waste transports are scheduled to leave on 

Tuesday for a French reprocessing facility in La Hague. 



The French state-owned nuclear utility Cogema has said the waste 

should arrive in France on Wednesday. 



Germany sends spent nuclear fuel from its plants to France for 

reprocessing under contracts that oblige it to take back the waste. 



Last month, anti-nuclear demonstrators turned out by the thousands 

and caused an 18-hour delay as authorities returned a shipment of 

reprocessed waste to the Gorleben dump. Police mounted a huge 

operation to secure that convoy. 



Germany and France agreed to resume transports of nuclear waste after 

a three-year break imposed by the previous German government after 

radiation leaks were discovered in some containers. 

- -------------



Union supports Greenpeace nuclear disaster campaign



9 April, Australian Broadcasting Corporation - The Maritime Union of 

Australia wants the Federal Government to ensure  it is prepared for 

accidents onboard ships carrying radioactive material  in Australian 

waters. 



The union has backed Greenpeace's campaign to have a response to  

accidents on nuclear ships included in the Commonwealth Disaster 

Plan.  



The Tasmanian secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia, Mike  

Wickham, says as merchant sailors are the ones who would probably be  

involved in any rescue, the union wants to ensure they are protected.



"We're called on at all times at sea to respond, and this government 

on  one hand is trying to get rid of our shipping fleet, and on the 

other  hand if it comes to an emergency they'll expect our merchant 

seamen and  seawomen to respond at a moment's notice," he said.  



"So we're not prepared to do that without some plans put in place 

that  says they're not at risk, or how they're going to deal with it 

when they  get there." 



A spokesman for the Defence Department says the disaster plan is  

currently under review and Greenpeace's concerns are being 

considered.

- --------------



Tokaimura residents undergo health checks following accident



MITO, Japan, April 8 (Kyodo) - Some 140 residents in and around 

Tokaimura village in Ibaraki Prefecture underwent a publicly funded 

health examination Sunday, the second since the 1999 nuclear accident 

in the village deemed Japan's worst, prefectural government officials 

said. 



The residents received cardiovascular checks and X-ray tests for 

cancer in addition to consultations with radiologists, the officials 

said. 



A 70-year-old village woman who visited a community center to undergo 

the examination said, ''I feel relieved to undergo the checks.'' 



Combined with two other health examinations slated for later this 

month, a total of 300 residents are expected to undergo the checks 

sponsored by the central and prefectural governments, the officials 

said. Some 340 residents underwent the first annual checks last 

spring. 



More than 600 people, mainly employees of a uranium processing plant 

run by JCO Co. in Tokaimura, about 120 kilometers northeast of Tokyo, 

and local residents were exposed to radiation from the Sept. 30, 

1999, nuclear fission chain reaction accident, according to the 

central government. 



Two of the workers at the plant -- Hisashi Ouchi and Masato Shinohara 

- -- died in December 1999 and April 2000, respectively, from radiation 

sickness. 



Last November, public prosecutors indicted six employees of JCO, a 

subsidiary of Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., on charges of negligence 

resulting in the death of the two. 



The accident occurred after workers poured an excessive amount of 

uranium solution into a processing tank using buckets, bypassing 

several required steps, prosecutors said. 

- -------------



US Agency May Preserve Birthplaces of Atom Bomb, NYT Says

  

Richland, Washington, April 7 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Department of 

Energy is studying the feasibility of decontaminating and preserving 

parts of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and seven other sites where 

research was undertaken to build the atom bomb, the New York Times 

reported. 



Other candidates being studied for preservation as national landmarks 

include Los Alamos, New Mexico, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the Trinity 

site south of Albuquerque, New Mexico. 



While most of the sites are too contaminated to allow sightseers to 

visit, the Hanford site has been nominated for eventual year-round 

tourism. 



Getting the Hanford reactor ready would cost an estimated $10 million 

beyond the billions of dollars that will be spent to clean up the 

site during the next few decades, Keith Klein, manager of the Energy 

Department office that oversees Hanford, told the paper. 

- --------------



Senator: Benefit Program Not Moving



WASHINGTON (AP) Apr 6 - The Bush administration has decided against 

giving the Justice Department control of a benefit program for sick 

nuclear workers, a senator who represents some of the ailing workers 

said Friday. 



``We got an assurance from the White House that they are not going to 

transfer it there,'' said Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M. 



Bingaman was one of the authors of the new entitlement program which, 

later this year, is supposed to start offering $150,000 and lifetime 

medical care to Cold War-era workers exposed to risky levels of 

radiation, silica or beryllium. 



He was among many worker advocates on Capitol Hill who strenuously 

objected when the White House circulated a proposed executive order 

transferring the new program from the Labor Department to the Justice 

Department. 



Labor Secretary Elaine Chao insisted her department was not the one 

best suited for the job. She was backed by from three influential 

congressmen: House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., 

Senate Judiciary Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Rep. John Boehner, 

R-Ohio, who heads the committee that oversees the Labor Department. 



But Bingaman had a few tricks up his sleeve. Without publicly 

revealing his strategy, he blocked pending nominations to Labor 

Department posts. 



The senator said he didn't even know the names of the nominees whose 

confirmation he threatened to sidetrack, but let the White House know 

he ``didn't want to go forward with any nominations there in the 

Department of Labor until we got some assurance that this wouldn't be 

going to Justice, where the history of efforts like this has been 

miserable.'' 



The Justice Department runs a program that gives one-time payments to 

former uranium miners and people who lived downwind of nuclear test 

blasts. But the program's small staff and lack of branch offices were 

two of the reasons the new program's authors didn't want Justice to 

run it. 



Lowell ``Pete'' Strader, legislative director for the union that 

represents workers at 11 sites in the nuclear weapons complex, 

welcomed Bingaman's announcement. ``We take that as wonderful news,'' 

said Strader. ``We knew Justice wasn't prepared to handle the 

program.'' 



Bingaman said the White House is ``still uncertain what exactly will 

be done with the program to make it work, but they are committed to 

making it work.'' 



- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle					Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   				    	

Director, Technical				Extension 2306 				     	

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service		Fax:(714) 668-3149 	                   		    

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.			E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net 				                           

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  		E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com          	          

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:31:37 -0400

From: Susan Gawarecki <loc@ICX.NET>

Subject: RE: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut



Ruth makes some good comments, but misses the point regarding citizen

participation.  There will always be upset parties screaming for action

whether or not there are Citizen Advisory Boards.  In fact, the

membership of the CABs tend to be much better informed on the issues

because of the willingness of DOE to provide technical assistance, and

when the activists are seated on the CABs it tends to moderate their

rhetoric.



The CABs are probably one of the reasons that more dialogue has taken

place between different sites in the DOE complex and more cross-cutting

issues have been appropriately addressed.  Moreover, when a CAB comments

on a proposed remediation strategy and has its concerns addressed, the

community as a whole is more likely to accept the path forward, a result

not seen previously when unilateral decisions were made without

significant community input.  Finally, the CABs are involved in the

annual budget cycle and generally review the site's priorities,

including the risk-based vs. the compliance-driven, which gives the

members a better understanding of why tradeoffs are made.  Letting

citizens have a good glimpse inside the system and understand at least a

little of the costs and benefits has, I believe, moved DOE forward in

accomplishing its cleanups.  This is certainly true in Oak Ridge, and

I've seen similar results at other sites.



I think James Stokes exaggerates the extent of the contamination.  The

vast majority of DOE lands are buffer zones, not contaminated areas.  In

Oak Ridge, about 15% of the 35,000 acres is contaminated.  Furthermore,

the impacted areas are the industrially developed or waste disposal

areas, not prime wildlife habitat.  No one realistically believes that

the contaminated areas will be returned to pristine condition, nor is

there any proposal to do so.  That is why stewardship has become such a

hot topic in Environmental Management--there has to be a way of

monitoring, maintaining protection, and disseminating information

regarding remediated sites with residual contamination or where wastes

remain in place.  And this has to be balanced with the desire of local

communities to have some of the developable land for

"reindustrialization" and the desire of preservationists to maintain

large undisturbed tracts of ecologically sensitive lands.



My opinions only,



Regards,

Susan

- -- 

.....................................................

Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director

Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee

                       -----                       

A schedule of meetings on DOE issues is posted on our Web site

http://www.local-oversight.org/meetings.html - E-mail loc@icx.net

.....................................................

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:32:52 -0700

From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

Subject: FPL Executives Keep Merger Bonuses



FPL Executives Keep Merger Bonuses

NEW ORLEANS (AP) Apr 8 -- FPL Group's failed merger with Entergy 

Corp. was a bust for the Florida utility's shareholders, but FPL's 

top executives exited the deal like lottery players who just hit the 

jackpot. 

In an unusual move even in this day of multimillion-dollar executive 

salaries and bonuses, FPL chairman and chief executive James 

Broadhead and his seven top lieutenants will keep $60 million in 

merger-related bonuses paid to them in cash in December after 

shareholders approved the deal. 

Broadhead's take alone from the failed merger was $21.1 million, 

which came on top of his normal salary of $974,000, along with $1.1 

million in performance bonuses and $13.5 million in accrued 

retirement benefits. Broadhead's total pay package in 2000 was $36.7 

million. 

The merger-related bonuses were part of a pre-existing, long-term 

incentive program for FPL executives that potentially would have been 

paid to them over a period of years as cash bonuses and extra stock 

options based in part on the company's financial performance. The 

better the company's performance, the bigger the bonuses. 

``Change of control'' clauses in the executives' contracts, which are 

common in American corporations, triggered the early payments as an 

incentive for the executives to stay with FPL after the merger even 

though their future with the new combined utility might be uncertain. 



What made the FPL payments highly unusual was that the lump sums were 

paid well in advance of the deal's completion, which was expected in 

late 2001. Most comparable ``change of control'' payments at other 

companies, including Entergy, are triggered by the closing of an 

acquisition. 

``I certainly can't recall the last time I saw something like this,'' 

said Gregory Phelps, a John Hancock Patriot Funds manager whose firm 

owns about 100,000 shares of FPL preferred stock. He said the 

bonuses, and the refusal by FPL executives to return the money, 

blemished the otherwise good reputation enjoyed by the management 

team among investors. 

Entergy executives did not receive any bonuses for the merger 

attempt, but Entergy president Don Hintz and Entergy Nuclear 

Operations chief executive Jerry Yelverton were in line for $5.52 

million in retention incentives that would have been paid in 

installments at the close of the deal and on the first three 

anniversaries. 

Entergy chief executive Wayne Leonard would not have received any 

bonuses or retention payments, although he stood to double his annual 

$836,538 salary after becoming chief executive officer of the 

combined utility. 







- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle					Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   				    	

Director, Technical				Extension 2306 				     	

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service		Fax:(714) 668-3149 	                   		    

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.			E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net 				                           

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  		E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com          	          

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 09:47:01 -0700

From: "H.B. Knowles" <hbknowles@HBKNOWLES.COM>

Subject: Natural Radiations in Hawai'i



Colleagues:



I am trying to obtain information ( moderately accurate annual 

- -dose-equivalents) spcifically for Hawai'i , more specifically for the U 

Hawai'i campus in Honolulu. This could include:



         1. Cosmic rays at ground level(special interest in neutron-induced 

dose-equivalent)



         2, Naturally occuring ground radioactivity (this location is  over 

some relatively recent basalt  flows)

         3, Radon



         4. Contribution of groundwater radioactivity.



A reference to a not-too-obscure journal article would be fine. I would 

appreciate any assistance.



Thank you,



H.B. Knowles, PhD, Physics Consulting

4030 Hillcrest Rd, El Sobrante, CA 94803

Phone (510)758-5449

Fax (510) 758-5508

<hbknowles@hbknowles.com>

<www.hbknowles.com>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:41:57 -0600 

From: "Neil, David M" <neildm@ID.DOE.GOV>

Subject: RE: two purposes



Since you're testing (and it came through just fine) does anyone else tend

to get responses to posts before the original post, almost all the time?



Any idea why this is, Mike?



Dave Neil		neildm@id.doe.gov



		When I was fourteen years old, I was amazed at how

unintelligent my father was. By the time I turned twenty-one, I was

astounded how much he had learned in the last seven years. -- Mark Twain



> -----Original Message-----

> From:	Michael Stabin [SMTP:michael.g.stabin@VANDERBILT.EDU]

> Sent:	Friday, April 06, 2001 4:40 PM

> To:	Radsafe

> Subject:	two purposes

> 

> 

> This e-mail serves two purposes - (1) to suggest that everyone not

> overreact

> to Ed Battle's misreading of Susan G's post, and (2) to test an attachment

> filter. If this message posts to the list, the filter didn't work, and

> I'll

> try again!

> 

> Mike

> 

> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP

> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

> Vanderbilt University

> 1161 21st Avenue South

> Nashville, TN 37232-2675

> Phone (615) 322-3190

> Fax   (615) 322-3764

> e-mail  michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu

> 

> "Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of"

> - Steven Wright

>  << File: CheckedIODemo.java >> 

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:47:05 -0700 (PDT)

From: mark sasser <duke99301@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: I need contacts for Inst.



I need to rent some of the following items.

I need to release a floor for radium.

any ideas?

thanks Mark Sasser RSO 



Two - 3 x 3 sodium iodide (Similar to Ludlum 44-20)

    Two - alpha hand held detectors (Similar to Ludlum

43-90)

    One - Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA)

    Five - 2221 Scaler/rate meters

    Two - 500 cm Probes (Similar to Ludlum 239-1F)

    Extra windows for the monitors and alphas





=====

mark sasser 

at duke99301@yahoo.com

you can also reach me at duke9930@concentric.net



__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 

http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:58:05 -0600 

From: "Neil, David M" <neildm@ID.DOE.GOV>

Subject: RE: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut



The entire 890 square miles is not contaminated.  The radiological

contamination is mostly in fairly circumscribed locations, as are the

chemical ones, the two often being the same areas.  Of more general

distribution is unexploded ordinance from when the Navy did gunnery here,

but that is being searched out and cleared.



But your point was well taken: total cleanup would be prohibitive in cost,

probably impossible, and definitely unverifiable.



Dave Neil		neildm@id.doe.gov



		When I was fourteen years old, I was amazed at how

unintelligent my father was. By the time I turned twenty-one, I was

astounded how much he had learned in the last seven years. -- Mark Twain



> -----Original Message-----

> From:	Stokes, James [SMTP:StokesJ@TTNUS.COM]

> Sent:	Saturday, April 07, 2001 7:54 AM

> To:	'RuthWeiner@AOL.COM '; 'loc@ICX.NET '; 'radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> '

> Subject:	RE: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut

> 

>  

> I would like to put this issue in my own personal perspective.  The U.S

> DOE

> Defense Programs complex consists of about 2000 square miles of

> radioactively and chemically contaminated lands.  Does anyone belive that

> there are enough tax dollars in The United Staes of America, to clean al

> of

> these lands to their original pristine condition?  Do the calculations,

> and

> I will be willing to bet against it.

> 

> Therefore, at some point, there will have to be a decision, that no more

> clean up will happen.  I am not saying that this is the time for that.  I

> am

> simply stating, pragmatically, that that time WILL come.

> 

> Therefore, we most diligantly, and RESPONSIBLY spend the money while it is

> available, to clean up as much as we can.  Because the "wallet" for

> cleanup

> is not bottomless.  Remember that the Weldon Springs, MO sight sat idle

> for

> fifteen years, before any money was appropriated for its cleanup.

> 

> Many do not know that it was the sister facility of the Fernald, OH site.

> Ask yourself why the Fernald sight received billions for its cleanup, when

> Weldon Springs only received millions.  Answer, politics, not technical

> justification.  Fernald is 1150 acres of uranium contamination.  Hanford

> is

> 570 sq miles, INEEL is 890 SQ. miles,  and Savannah River Site is about

> 270

> sq. miles.  These sites have transuranic contamiation.  Just usinf a

> simple

> linear extrapolation,  the U.S. budget could not handle a cleanup to

> pristine conditions in our lifetime.

> 

> The decisions that will have to be made will be emotional, negotiations

> protracted, and in the end, will satisfy noone.  But all of us must look

> at

> what CAN be achieved, and do our best to ensure that the most that can be

> done, will be.  But there will be a point at which the cleanup will have

> to

> end, because there just simply is just not enough money to do it all.

> 

> These are my opinions alne, and probably conflict with many others who

> naively believe that we can have it all.

> -----Original Message-----

> From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM

> To: loc@ICX.NET; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Sent: 4/6/01 6:16 PM

> Subject: Re: DOE cleanup to fund tax cut

> 

> As at least one respondent pointed out, the sites are currently

> ecological 

> preserves, precisely because human access is limited.  Hanford's NERP 

> (National Environmental Research Park) is in fact a rather unique

> ecology 

> since it is a temperate zone desert.  It's called the Arid Lands Ecology

> 

> (ALE) site, and was inaugurated in 1976. 

> 

> I might also point out that in 1991 or 1992, when I was on a NAS risk 

> prioritization panel, Curt Travis at Oak Ridge used a program called

> MEPAS to 

> identify the most hazardous sites in the DOE complex, and there were

> really 

> only a few places that posed any significant risk.  However, this made

> most 

> of the citizen activists mad, because in any prioritization some sites

> end up 

> high on the list and others , lower.  At their behest, Hazel O'Leary 

> eliminated the prioritization idea (and the NAS panel) and instituted

> the 

> Citizens' Advisory Boards, following some meeting at the Keystone

> conference 

> center in Colorado that resulted in the so-called "Keystone Accords"

> that 

> gave "stakeholders" a voice in what to clean up and how to do it.  And

> here 

> we are! 

> 

> Ruth Weiner, Ph. D. 

> ruthweiner@aol.com

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:42:11 -0700

From: "tom_dixie" <tom_dixie@MSN.COM>

Subject: Re: I need contacts for Inst.



Mark,



More information is required.



How big is the floor?

How long has the radium been there?

Has the floor been resurfaced since the material was there?

Has the floor been painted?

What is the floor made of?

How much radium do you anticipate?

If you are using the large area gas flow proportional probes (239-1F) you

will need P-10 counting gas.  I would recommend a suspension mechanism for

the probes (like a floor monitor).

Is the structure occupied?

Do you observe a radon buildup in the structure?

The MCA and NaI will only be of use if there is sufficient activity and may

cause confusion rather than allow for release.

The 2221 is a good instument but there are better for dealing with this

situation because the 2221 requires two counts and a voltage change to count

for alpha and beta.

The alpha emissions are easily masked and both alpha and beta emissions from

the surface should be measured.

Be sure to clean the surface (remove all probe destroying debris) before

using the large area probes.



Tom O'Dou

tom_dixie@msn.com



- ----- Original Message -----

From: "mark sasser" <duke99301@YAHOO.COM>

To: "RADSAFE" <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 11:47 AM

Subject: I need contacts for Inst.





>

> I need to rent some of the following items.

> I need to release a floor for radium.

> any ideas?

> thanks Mark Sasser RSO

>

> Two - 3 x 3 sodium iodide (Similar to Ludlum 44-20)

>     Two - alpha hand held detectors (Similar to Ludlum

> 43-90)

>     One - Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA)

>     Five - 2221 Scaler/rate meters

>     Two - 500 cm Probes (Similar to Ludlum 239-1F)

>     Extra windows for the monitors and alphas

>

>

> =====

> mark sasser

> at duke99301@yahoo.com

> you can also reach me at duke9930@concentric.net

>

> __________________________________________________

> Do You Yahoo!?

> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.

> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:53:49 -0700

From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

Subject: RE: two purposes



Hi Dave,



No, I always receive the original post and then all subsequent 

replies.



I know that there is often a 1 to 1.5 hour delay between sending the 

post and actually receiving it. This si all dependent on the host 

server activity. On weekends, the response time is significantly 

greater.



- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle					Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   				    	

Director, Technical				Extension 2306 				     	

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service		Fax:(714) 668-3149 	                   		    

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.			E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net 				                           

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  		E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com          	          

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://sandyfl.nukeworker.net

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:50:00 +0200

From: "Franz Schoenhofer" <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>

Subject: Re:  question about Vatican broadcasting



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



- ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0011_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0"





- ------=_NextPart_001_0011_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0

Content-Type: text/plain;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable





    -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----

    Von: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM <RuthWeiner@AOL.COM>

    An: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

    Datum: Sonntag, 08. April 2001 19:26

    Betreff: question about Vatican broadcasting

   =20

   =20

    Perhaps some RADSAFER  -- especially perhaps a European one -- could =

answer a=20

    question that came up this morning in an article about the power of =

the=20

    Vatican radio and TV transmitter.

   =20

   =20

    I have no information about units and measurements, but I think that =

some RADSAFErs might be interested in the background of this story.=20

    I quote from an Austrian newspaper, about one or two weeks ago:

    "The Italian Minister for Environment has repeated his threat to cut =

off power supply for Radio Vatican, if the Italian standards for =

electro-smog would not be met. ..................... Already two days =

before a court in Rome has started investigations because of negligent =

homicide against "unknown", because of an elevated number of leukemia =

cases. According to newspapers children in the vicinity of the antennas =

are affected up to six times more by leukemia than elsewhere."

    Then follow sophisticated juridical considerations, whether Italian =

legislation is applicable in matters of Radio Vatican. The Italian =

Minister for Environment declared, that he would order cutoff of power =

supply, if the Italian standards would not be met by May 12.=20

   =20

    Well, Radsafers, you recognize the pattern? Radiation (nuclear, =

radioactive, non-ionizing one) =3D leukemia. Radiation (nuclear, =

radioactive, non-ionizing one, UV) =3D cancer. Two-fold, six-fold, =

significant occurrance. Sources: Nuclear power plants, mobile phones, =

microwaves, reprocessing plants, the sun, cosmic rays.=20

    I do not downplay serious risks at high doses, but it seems to have =

become a habit among certain groups and people, to attribute everything =

bad in our civilized world to something, which cannot be seen, smelled, =

heard. Are we really so far away from the Middle Ages, where everything =

negative was attributed to ghosts and devils? Does anybody know about =

psychological research on such topics? This is a serious question!!

    Regards,

    Franz





- ------=_NextPart_001_0011_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0

Content-Type: text/html;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>



<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =

http-equiv=3DContent-Type>

<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>

</HEAD>

<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>

<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px">

    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Urspr&uuml;ngliche=20

    Nachricht-----</B><BR><B>Von: </B><A=20

    href=3D"mailto:RuthWeiner@AOL.COM";>RuthWeiner@AOL.COM</A> &lt;<A=20

    =

href=3D"mailto:RuthWeiner@AOL.COM";>RuthWeiner@AOL.COM</A>&gt;<BR><B>An: =

</B><A=20

    =

href=3D"mailto:radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu";>radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu</=

A>=20

    &lt;<A=20

    =

href=3D"mailto:radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu";>radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu</=

A>&gt;<BR><B>Datum:=20

    </B>Sonntag, 08. April 2001 19:26<BR><B>Betreff: </B>question about =

Vatican=20

    broadcasting<BR><BR></DIV></FONT><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT=20

    color=3D#000080 size=3D2><B>Perhaps some RADSAFER &nbsp;-- =

especially perhaps a=20

    European one -- could answer a <BR>question that came up this =

morning in an=20

    article about the power of the <BR>Vatican radio and TV=20

    transmitter.</B></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT color=3D#000080=20

size=3D2><B></B></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT color=3D#000080=20

size=3D2><B></B></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><STRONG><FONT=20

    color=3D#000080 face=3DArial size=3D2>I have no information about =

units and=20

    measurements, but <STRONG><FONT color=3D#000080 face=3DArial =

size=3D2>I think that=20

    some RADSAFErs might be interested in the background of this story.=20

    </FONT></STRONG></FONT></STRONG></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><STRONG><FONT=20

    color=3D#000080 face=3DArial size=3D2><STRONG><FONT color=3D#000080 =

face=3DArial=20

    size=3D2></FONT></STRONG></FONT></STRONG><FONT color=3D#000000 =

face=3DArial=20

    size=3D2>I quote from an Austrian newspaper, about one or two weeks=20

ago:</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    color=3D#000000 face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =

size=3D2>&quot;The=20

    Italian Minister for Environment has repeated his threat to cut off =

power=20

    supply for Radio Vatican, if the Italian standards for electro-smog =

would=20

    not be met. ..................... Already two days before a court in =

Rome=20

    has started investigations because of negligent homicide against=20

    &quot;unknown&quot;, because of an elevated number of leukemia =

cases.=20

    According to newspapers children in the vicinity of the antennas are =



    affected up to six times more by leukemia than=20

elsewhere.&quot;</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3DArial size=3D2>Then follow sophisticated juridical =

considerations,=20

    whether Italian legislation is applicable in matters of Radio =

Vatican. The=20

    Italian Minister for Environment declared, that he would order =

cutoff of=20

    power supply, if the Italian standards would not be met by May 12.=20

</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3DArial size=3D2>Well, Radsafers, you recognize the pattern? =

Radiation=20

    (nuclear, radioactive, non-ionizing one) =3D leukemia. Radiation =

(nuclear,=20

    radioactive, non-ionizing one, UV) =3D cancer. Two-fold, six-fold, =

significant=20

    occurrance. Sources: Nuclear power plants, mobile phones, =

microwaves,=20

    reprocessing plants, the sun, cosmic rays. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    face=3DArial size=3D2>I do not downplay serious risks at high doses, =

but it=20

    seems to have become a habit among certain groups and people, to =

attribute=20

    everything bad in our civilized world to something, which cannot be =

seen,=20

    smelled, heard. Are we really so far away from the Middle Ages, =

where=20

    everything negative was attributed to ghosts and devils? Does =

anybody know=20

    about psychological research on such topics? This is a serious=20

    question!!</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><STRONG><FONT=20

    color=3D#000080 face=3DArial size=3D2><STRONG><FONT color=3D#000080 =

face=3DArial=20

    size=3D2>Regards,</FONT></STRONG></FONT></STRONG></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    color=3D#000000 face=3DArial size=3D2>Franz</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE=20

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =

5px"><FONT=20

    color=3D#000000 face=3DArial =

size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>



- ------=_NextPart_001_0011_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0--



- ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0

Content-Type: text/x-vcard;

	name="Franz Schoenhofer.vcf"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Disposition: attachment;

	filename="Franz Schoenhofer.vcf"



BEGIN:VCARD

VERSION:2.1

N:Schoenhofer;Franz

FN:Franz Schoenhofer

EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:franz.schoenhofer@bmu.gv.at

REV:20010409T214959Z

END:VCARD



- ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C0C14F.CA23E0E0--



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 21:58:08 -0000

From: "Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@HOTMAIL.COM>

Subject: Water whirlers etc



Several people asked me about the water whirlers - they are installed in the 

water pipes so that the water passes through them before you use the water 

(why not combine the mobile phone with the shower? - The shapes are 

approximately the same - and the phone always rings when you are in the 

shower - right? -Hey I could get a patent and a new career...).

You can see what the water whirler looks like at:

http://www.plusochminus.nu/produkt.htm



Sorry about all the Swedish but it is explained that the water is better for 

drinking, for laundry, baking, shampoing, the fish in your aquarium and 

"Etc". I like that last specified point: Etc.



As you can see there is an air whirler ("Luftvirvlare") as well.



For the cartoon with the cell phones:

Swedish word "UTAN" = English WITHOUT.

Swedish word "MED" = English "WITH".



"Plus & Minus-mössa" = A cap you can wear when you visit green houses.



Glasses and hearing aides may also need "balancing".



"Forskning" (=Research) at their website explains that tomatoes grow better 

with whirled water but that they aren't allowed to use it in their 

marketing.



My personal ideas and reflections only,



Bjorn Cedervall    bcradsafers@hotmail.com

http://www.geocities.com/bjorn_cedervall/



_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:20:13 +0500

From: "ishtiaq.hussain" <ishtiaq.hussain@AKU.EDU>

Subject: Survey Monitors



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand

this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C19F.72BAF5F0

Content-Type: text/plain;

	charset="iso-8859-1"



Dear All,

Thank you all for replying to my email requesting info. on survey monitors.

Now I have another query.

Is it necessary or a standard practice to keep a radiation source for future

calibrations of the survey monitors in a hospital department.

Regards

- ---Hunzaie



- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C19F.72BAF5F0

Content-Type: text/html;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =

charset=3Diso-8859-1">

<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =

5.5.2653.12">

<TITLE>Survey Monitors</TITLE>

</HEAD>

<BODY>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Dear All,</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Thank you all for replying to my =

email requesting info. on survey monitors.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Now I have another query.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Is it necessary or a standard =

practice to keep a radiation source for future calibrations of the =

survey monitors in a hospital department.</FONT></P>



<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Regards</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">---Hunzaie</FONT>

</P>



</BODY>

</HTML>

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0C19F.72BAF5F0--

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.



------------------------------



End of radsafe-digest V1 #30

****************************



***********************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe digest mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text

"unsubscribe radsafe-digest" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line.