[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tritium exit signs - not
In a message dated 6/18/2001 1:56:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GNICHOLL@DEP.STATE.NJ.US writes:
> Properly installed and maintained, these signs pose no significant hazard.
> Two incidents here in New Jersey in the past five years demonstrate what
can
> happen when they are not given the care they deserve.
>
> In the first incident a teenaged male walking by a building demolition
site
> picked up components of a sign, took it home and "opened it", breaking the
> glass tubing, in his basement bedroom. The cost to clean up the tritium,
> dispose of the contaminated material and test him and others who were in
the
> room was over $60,000.
>
> In a second incident, a teenaged male client at a state operated
residential
> facility for individuals with severe emotional problems tore a sign off the
> wall and smashed it, contaminating himself, an attendant who was subduing
him
> and rugs, furniture and draperies in a common room located in a dormitory.
> Clean up, disposal and testing of the individuals involved cost more than $
> 150,000.
>
I wonder if the cleanup and testing was necessary. The licensing of the sign
manufacturers must consider the consequences of such a release. Was the
testing and cleanup demanded by New Jersey? Was any reference made to the
license criteria for these signs? If so, was there a decision that there was
a problem that was not addressed in the licensing? Maybe it was done just to
be safe. This is the traditional response even though there is no exposure
risk. I would like to see some numbers besides cost for such an incident.
The industry needs the information.
John Andrews
Knoxville, Tennessee
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.