RE: Po-210 in tobacco

["Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@HOTMAIL.COM>]

>More than a few years ago I attended a short OSHA radiation safety course 

>taught by Dr. Herbert Cember.  In that class he opined that he thought that 

>more than 50% of lung cancers associated with cigarette smoking were caused 

>by the radioactivity (Po-210) in the cigarettes.

---

In 1977 (approx) it was stated that cigarette smoke contains at least about 

20 000 different chemical substances that are harmful to humans. I find it 

difficult to single out any one of those substances as responsible for lung 

cancers - or is there a shortcut to get the 50 % for Po-210 answer? And in a 

sense - who cares (OK we want to know about radiation risks) - when the 

bottom line is "don't smoke!".



My personal ideas only,



Bjorn Cedervall   bcradsafers@hotmail.com

http://www.geocities.com/bjorn_cedervall/







_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.