Re: N-test illnesses "unlikely" for NZ veterans - govt

["Raymond Shadis" <shadis@ime.net>]

Radsafelist,

 Is this diatribe from Franz an example of the professionalism claimed for

this list? If the answer is, yes, then I and no doubt you would appreciate

my name being removed. Thank you very much.

                                                             Ray

----- Original Message -----

From: Franz Schoenhofer <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>

To: RADSAFE <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>; nuclear news list

<sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 7:09 PM

Subject: Re: N-test illnesses "unlikely" for NZ veterans - govt





>

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

> Von: Sandy Perle <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

> An: nuclear news list <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>

> Datum: Sonntag, 15. Juli 2001 20:07

> Betreff: N-test illnesses "unlikely" for NZ veterans - govt

>

>

> Index:

>

> N-test illnesses "unlikely" for NZ veterans - govt

> Greenpeace says U.S poses new Pacific risk

> Myanmar in nuclear reactor deal with Russia

> ==================================

>

>

>

> Greenpeace says U.S poses new Pacific risk

>

> SYDNEY, July 15 (Reuters) - Environmental group Greenpeace on

> Sunday accused the United States of posing a new nuclear arms

> risk in the Pacific after it shot down a mock warhead over the

> Pacific Ocean in a successful anti-ballistic missile test.

>

> ---------------------------------------------------------------

>

> Greenpeace says, Greenpeace demands, Greenpeace urges, Greenpeace

uncovers,

> Greenpeace does, Greenpeace............

>

> What world do we live in, that a commercial company like Greenpeace, which

> sells "dreams" and all kind of stuff, which nobody needs in their sales

> offices in the USA, which has sent to me letters to pay money (quite a

lot)

> to be virtually on their whalers fighting boats and which uses obviously

> very costly public relations companies to raise money - what for - plays

> such a role? As I might have written before, Greenpeace is an absolutely

> undemocratic, commercial company and I cannot understand, that something

> like this is hailed as the saviour of our planet! Until now I thought

> Greenpeace claimed to save the world from environmental crash down - now

> they go into politics? When the oil wells in Kuwait burned, they did not

> bother to make any comment on the environmental impact. What kind of

> organisation is that?

>

> I can tell you, that I personally am absolutely opposed to what is now

going

> on regarding ABM and the "Nuclear shield" or whatever it is called. Most

> people thought with the downbreak of the Sovjet Empire there was a chance

to

> finish with all the threats of nuclear deterrance and the world came a

long

> way to that goal. Now we face new nuclear powers, Bush declares the

> Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty dead, underground tests are likely to be

> resumed by the US.

>

> Am I now a supporter of Greenpeace??????

>

> Franz

>

>

>

>

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.