- To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM, jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
- Subject: RE: Statistics 101
- From: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:01:39 -0400
- Reply-To: "Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>
- Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
I assume you do hold out the possibility that global warming is a real phenomenon.-- John
-----Original Message-----
From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM [mailto:RuthWeiner@AOL.COM]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:39 AM
To: jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: Statistics 101. . .
The "greens" aren't ALWAYS all wrong. In the case of ozone, they
over-reacted Let's not get carried away and denigrate the good science with
the junk science. I question global warming in part because neither a
consistent explanation nor a consistent mechanism has been proposed, nor can
I figure out how they tell. The ozone depletion mechanism is a model of an
observed phenomenoin, not like global warming, which is a prediction based on
a not-yet-validated model.
Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com