[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Airport safety-xrays
Dear Phil:
I was very serious about may question regarding the
practicality and dosage from a whole body x-ray
scanner at airport security check-ins. If practical,
perhaps this would be the way to eliminate high costs
associated with security and its delays.
Paul Shafer
--- PBarring@KDHE.STATE.KS.US wrote:
>
> Golly gee, maybe we could institute strip searches
> and body cavity exams as
> well!
>
> OK Folks, this is just too much. I am sorry Paul to
> pick on your post for
> me to flame over, but I can't stand it any more.
> These knee jerk reactions
> are going to put this country into traction. The
> last time I checked, the
> Constitution of this country GUARANTEED freedom from
> unreasonable search
> and seizure. At what point will we be satisfied?
> At what point will we
> start to say, "Hey! That is MY property you are
> taking."? Ceramic knives?
> PLASTIC KNIVES!? How about poly-carbonate guns that
> use air for
> propellant? What about playing cards? Pens?
> Pencils? Eyeglasses? Ask
> any Army Ranger, SEAL or Marine Scout and they will
> tell you that almost
> anything can be used as a deadly weapon. Just how
> much of our freedom are
> we willing to give up in order to FEEL safe? Are
> the business travelers
> willing to give up their cell phones and laptops?
> Because you will. How
> about cameras? Unless you can demonstrate that the
> camera really is a
> camera or open it for inspection, they will go too.
> Writing instruments?
> Nope, they're sharp. Knives and forks in first
> class or on dinner flights?
> Nope, soup of the day. Do we all really want all of
> our possessions pawed
> over by overworked and underpaid security guards?
> How about automatic
> weapon toting pseudo soldiers roaming the airports
> and guarding the gates
> and parking lots? Sound radical? Sound hysterical?
> You bet! Because
> that is what is overtaking the country right now.
> Hysteria. The gun
> toting guards are already a reality in many other
> countries. Terrorists
> still manage to travel freely. Why? Because they
> know how to blend in and
> not draw attention. Any determined terrorist or
> madman WILL get aboard a
> plane. They WILL find a weapon, whether they bring
> it or find it. And,
> they WILL threaten the passengers and crew, if that
> is their goal. All the
> precautions in the world won't stop them. Well,
> maybe if we strap everyone
> down for the flight and shoot anyone who tries to
> move. What we, as a
> country need to realize, and FAST, is that unless we
> WANT to give up a
> significant amount of freedom, we will have to
> except a certain amount of
> risk. We cannot be safe all the time.
>
> Last night President Bush announced the
> establishment of a new cabinet
> position. Office of Home Security. Doesn't anyone
> remember the Red Scare?
> Doesn't anyone remember McCarthyism?
>
> If we allow what happened to the US on September 11,
> 2001 to remove any our
> freedoms. Then we will have lost the entire
> conflict. The terrorists will
> HAVE accomplished their mission. Any battles, wars
> or legal pronouncements
> from this point on are meaningless. The war on
> terror will already be over
> and we will have given the terrorists everything
> they wanted. Sure, we
> need to be more vigilant. Yes, we needed to have
> our complacency shaken.
> And strange as it may sound, yes, this tragedy HAS
> brought the country
> together, for now. But if we allow fear to guide
> our path from now on;
> this country, and all she stands for WILL fall. We
> will have allowed fear
> to conquer us and America as well.
>
> Please think about this in the days and months to
> come. Winston Churchill
> said it best in the darkest hours of the Battle of
> Britain; "We nothing to
> fear, but fear itself". The best thing we as
> Americans can do is continue
> as before. Travel, continue business as usual. Be
> a little more wary, and
> keep our eyes open, but don't let fear rule us.
> Don't let fear rule our
> representatives in congress and in the
> Administration.
>
> Thank you all in Radsafe for putting up with my
> rant, but don't just read
> it and delete it. THINK about what I have said.
>
> Peace to us all
>
> Phil
>
> "The opinions in this post are mine and mine alone,
> unless you agree with
> them and then they can be yours as well. My
> employer has no say in my
> opinions, yet."
>
>
>
>
> Dear radsafe:
>
> As many of you know already, there are x-ray
> machines
> used at some US prisons which are used to whole body
> x-ray persons entered the prisons. These machines
> can
> detect ceramic/plastic knives and plastic explosive
> packages on the surface of bodies or even embedded
> inside the human body. Perhaps these devices should
> be used at boarding areas at airports.
>
> Do anyone know what the shallow/deep dose
> equivalents
> would be for a whole body x-ray scan which this type
> of system?
>
> Would an electron beam tommography unit work in this
> type of application? What would the dose equivalent
> be using this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul Shafer
>
>
>
>
>
************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing
> list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put
> the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
> with no subject line.
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.