[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NCRP 136



Jerry,
I like to think there are regulators the do care and would like to see changes.  I know of several who would like to see recycling of spent reactor fuel, less restriction on site remediation, etc.  I do argue that safety regulations need to protect all workers, and we should not discriminate against any because of biological defects, e.g., poor immune systems.
 
The problem has been to separate known risks from perceived risks.  And control the real risks.

-- John

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Cohen [mailto:jjcohen@prodigy.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Jacobus, John (OD/ORS); Ted Rockwell; RadSafe
Subject: Re: NCRP 136

John,
    Unfortunately, I can't disagree you. I guess that the life of a regulator is pretty easy. I know of no instance where a regulator has been jailed, fired, or reprimanded in any way for overregulating. As you suggest, Congress has essentially given them a license to do so. The sad part of all this is that all of the money and other limited resources  squandered in controlling non-problems, might actually do some good if it were directed toward areas of actual risk that have no political constituancy. "The squeaking hinge gets the oil."     Jerry