[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Anthrax question



Maury,

The following is from the MMWR of August 17, 2001, which can be found at.



http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5032a1.htm

. . .



Editorial Note:

This report presents the first case of cutaneous anthrax in the United

States since 1992. In the United States, the annual incidence of human

anthrax declined from approximately 200 cases in the early 1900s to no human

cases since 1992. Although most cases reported in the United States have

been cutaneous, 18 cases of inhalational anthrax were reported during the

20th century, most recently in 1976 (1). No cases of gastrointestinal

anthrax have been reported in the United States. 



-- John 



John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist 

3050 Traymore Lane

Bowie, MD  20715-2024



E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)      

-----Original Message-----

From: maury [mailto:maury@WEBTEXAS.COM]

Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:30 AM

To: The Wilsons

Cc: Marco Caceci; Radiation Safety

Subject: Re: Anthrax question





          Well, in a way ....  I believe it reasonable to wonder how many

deaths

over the past hundred years. for example, were attributed to other

respiratory

diseases which were actually due to anthrax. This would seem reasonable if

death

occurred before the symptoms reached a sufficiently acute stage to be

clearly

obvious that it was anthrax.  Just speculation on my part.

Sincerely,

Maury Siskel        maury@webtexas.com

----------------------

Help your government get a grip! In addition to constructive

ideas to DoD,  here is a web site which will provide great

command over this whole communication process with not only

elected officials, but also with appropriate media outlets for

letters (emails) to editors, and so on:



             http://capwiz.com/townhall/dbq/officials/



================================

The Wilsons wrote:



> Possible, and the corollary of course is, are we having people die from

> anthrax now only because we are looking for anthrax deaths?

>

> Marco Caceci wrote:

>

> > Attaboy Maury!

> >

> > > Is there just a wee possibility that we are finding anthrax spores

> > > "everywhere" because only now are we looking everywhere for them?

> >

> > Marco



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.