[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consequences of attack on nuclear facility



Title: RE: Consequences of attack on nuclear facility
Note that the referenced website links to Sandia's photo series on the airplane vs. containment material test.

Jack Earley
Radiological Engineer
 
Enercon Services, Inc.
6525 N. Meridian, Suite 503
OKC, OK  73116
phone: 405-722-7693
fax:       405-722-7694
jearley@enercon.com
 
************************************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Enercon Services, Inc. proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Enercon Services, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 11, 2001 9:45 a.m.
Subject: RE: Consequences of attack on nuclear facility

Some interesting comments from the 7 Oct. 2001 Toronto Sun article, "Disaster waiting to happen," p.30 & 32 (author ??) :

      <SNIP>
      ...said Ross, lead witness in Canada's first Special Committee on Terrorism and Public Safety in 1986. "I immediately thought of the CN Tower... that would be a spectacular target that would get a lot of attention. Not far away, you've got the SkyDome and large concentrations of business...

      <SNIP>
      Pat Quinn, of Quinn Dressel and Associates, who designed the Scotiabank and Royal Bank towers and the World Trade residences at Harbourfront, said......the chances of the ScotiaBank building buckling after an aircraft collision are "very small" because it is a "much tougher building" than the Trade Center.

      <SNIP>
      While he agrees the CN Tower would be a spectacular target for another hijacked aircraft, Quinn said a plane hitting the reinforced concrete shaft "would be like throwing a piece of butter against a brick wall."

      "The only vulnerable part would be the observation deck, but that would be a tough target for an amateur pilot."
      Quinn echoed Thompson's concerns about parcel and truck bombs. He said overall ground security at all Toronto commercial buildings needs improving.

      <SNIP>

Jaro

PS. check out Dr. Jeremy Whitlock's new Canadian Nuclear FAQ item, "How are CANDU nuclear plants protected from terrorist attacks?" at http://www.ncf.ca/~cz725/cnf_sectionD.htm#terrorist