[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More proposals (SF problem) Re: Norm avoids nothing!



Tim, that web page is very good at addressing all the issues surrounding 10

CFR 71 testing of Type B packages.  It is the best compliation I have ever

seen.  A good use of our tax dollars for sure.





"In science there is only physics; everything else is stamp collecting."

                                      --Ernest Rutherford



Dean Chaney, CHP, IBA (aka High Plains Drifter)

Fairfield, CA

magna1@jps.net

----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim" <tstead@ntirs.org>

To: "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan@FERNALD.GOV>; "'Kerimbaev'"

<kerrembaev@YAHOO.COM>; <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:20 PM

Subject: RE: More proposals (SF problem) Re: Norm avoids nothing!





> Check out the following web page:

>

> http://www.sandia.gov/tp/SAFE_RAM/SEVERITY.HTM

>

> It has some impressive pictures and movies of actual

> severe accident cask tests.

>

> Tim

>

> --- "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan@FERNALD.GOV>

> wrote:

> > Norm ,

> > Please , before further comment , lookup the spec.

> > on the construction of the transport containers for

> > spent fuel. They test them by leaving them on a

> > railroad crossing and smashing into them at a high

> > rate of speed and the maintain their integrity.

> > Floyd

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: Kerimbaev [mailto:kerrembaev@YAHOO.COM]

> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:52 AM

> > To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> > Subject: More proposals (SF problem) Re: Norm avoids

> > nothing!

> >

> >

> > You wrote:

> >

> > >>>>>

> > Subject: Re: Norm avoids nothing!

> >

> > As far as getting all the waste off now, that

> > would do two things I'd oppose - it would allow

> > the nuclear plants to operate forever since there

> > would be no constraints due to waste, and would

> > produce so many 1000s of shipments to Yucca that

> > an accident or terror incident is bound to

> > happen.

> >

> > norm

> > >>>>>>>

> >

> >

> > Norm,

> >

> > 1. I am sorry, but your position is not taking

> > ANY.

> >

> > 1.1 WE are offering to YOU an illumination of

> > IMMEDATE and REAL threat associated with the S.

> > Fuel.

> >

> > 1.2 You are sounding  somewhat in a way

> > reasonable but afraid that power plants will keep

> > running because there will be LESS problems!

> >

> > 2.  Do you really know what do you want?

> >

> > 2.1  Keeping a "hot topic" alive = presents of an

> > immediate and a real safety problem.

> >

> > or

> >

> > 2.2  Make this world safer, NOW?

> >

> > 3.   More of the Proposals:

> >

> > 3.1. How about for you changing the "teams"?

> >

> > 3.2 Realistically, the "green movement" is aging

> > as it was refereed the same way to the present

> > nuclear reactors/some not replaced steam

> > generators and the movement will not get any more

> > greener/younger addition, contrary to that we

> > WILL be building many of new and BETTER reactors

> > with and without steam generators.

> > So life will get better, safer and warmer/cooler.

> >

> > So pop on the train when the sits are still

> > available. :-)

> >

> > 3.3 Be our NEW spoke person?

> > Our present public relations services are "stuck"

> > with the old very NON "user friendly" methods and

> > we are in a REAL need for a "new and KNOWLEGABLE

> > blood" and improvements!

> >

> > 3.4 I do not see anything shameful for anybody

> > to abound an ideological movement which HAVE its

> > POSITIVE achievements in the PAST but has lost

> > its positives  = progressives in the present

> > days.

> >

> > 4. TODAY, we have more than ENOUGH of the

> > environmental regulations to keep our natural

> > habitats suitable for the safe and decent living.

> >

> > 5. I do not hesitate to say: " THANK YOU, for

> > MANY of these POSITIVE environmental improvements

> > to OUR habitat; among them illumination of the

> > acid rains, revival of the many poisoned water

> > bodies in OUR "dark industrial" past".

> >

> > 5.1 Now, it would be a POSITIVE step for you to

> > help US with the creation sort of a "Green

> > militia" for the safe transporting of the Spent

> > Fuel to Yucca.

> >

> > 5.2 To some it may sound romantic or even naive?

> > But,

> > What could be a better assurance for you for a

> > safe relocation of the S. Fuel?

> >

> > 5.3 Of course, it is if you are a "progressive

> > green/environmentalist"

> > By that I mean that you want IMPROVEMENTS rather

> > than pursuing a PURE "green idea"  for this

> > planet with "Greenfields", but with NO people on

> > it....

> >

> >

> > Truce,

> >

> > Emil.

> >

> > P.S.

> >

> > NOT to offend ANY one HERE.

> > I have noticed that you were posting Gandhi's

> > expression with your email signature.

> >

> > Here is a little bit on the past and present of

> > the world's socio-economical politics.

> > I believe that Gandhi COULD've done better for

> > the people in India in socio-economical terms.

> > The PRESENT "cast system" and drinking water

> > problem are some of them.

> > Discrimination by the outsiders ( by British) was

> > UNacceptable but discrimination among your own

> > people is ACCEPTABLE?

> > Isn't it a "Blind Locality Syndrome" kind of a

> > dysfunctional family problems?

> > It has nothing to do against India in particular,

> > generally, many people may be surprised that a

> > similar "Cast System" exists in some very

> > advanced countries.

> > I guess, getting enough food and water does not

> > necessary bring a peace to the family.  :-)

> >

> > It just stops fights for the food...........

> >

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> > Do You Yahoo!?

> > Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting,

> > just $8.95/month.

> > http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

> >

> ************************************************************************

> > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> > list. To unsubscribe,

> > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put

> > the text "unsubscribe

> > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> > with no subject line.

> >

> ************************************************************************

> > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> > list. To unsubscribe,

> > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put

> > the text "unsubscribe

> > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> > with no subject line.

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

> Do You Yahoo!?

> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.

> http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.