[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: More proposals (SF problem) Re: Norm avoids nothing!
Check out the following web page:
http://www.sandia.gov/tp/SAFE_RAM/SEVERITY.HTM
It has some impressive pictures and movies of actual
severe accident cask tests.
Tim
--- "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan@FERNALD.GOV>
wrote:
> Norm ,
> Please , before further comment , lookup the spec.
> on the construction of the transport containers for
> spent fuel. They test them by leaving them on a
> railroad crossing and smashing into them at a high
> rate of speed and the maintain their integrity.
> Floyd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kerimbaev [mailto:kerrembaev@YAHOO.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:52 AM
> To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: More proposals (SF problem) Re: Norm avoids
> nothing!
>
>
> You wrote:
>
> >>>>>
> Subject: Re: Norm avoids nothing!
>
> As far as getting all the waste off now, that
> would do two things I'd oppose - it would allow
> the nuclear plants to operate forever since there
> would be no constraints due to waste, and would
> produce so many 1000s of shipments to Yucca that
> an accident or terror incident is bound to
> happen.
>
> norm
> >>>>>>>
>
>
> Norm,
>
> 1. I am sorry, but your position is not taking
> ANY.
>
> 1.1 WE are offering to YOU an illumination of
> IMMEDATE and REAL threat associated with the S.
> Fuel.
>
> 1.2 You are sounding somewhat in a way
> reasonable but afraid that power plants will keep
> running because there will be LESS problems!
>
> 2. Do you really know what do you want?
>
> 2.1 Keeping a "hot topic" alive = presents of an
> immediate and a real safety problem.
>
> or
>
> 2.2 Make this world safer, NOW?
>
> 3. More of the Proposals:
>
> 3.1. How about for you changing the "teams"?
>
> 3.2 Realistically, the "green movement" is aging
> as it was refereed the same way to the present
> nuclear reactors/some not replaced steam
> generators and the movement will not get any more
> greener/younger addition, contrary to that we
> WILL be building many of new and BETTER reactors
> with and without steam generators.
> So life will get better, safer and warmer/cooler.
>
> So pop on the train when the sits are still
> available. :-)
>
> 3.3 Be our NEW spoke person?
> Our present public relations services are "stuck"
> with the old very NON "user friendly" methods and
> we are in a REAL need for a "new and KNOWLEGABLE
> blood" and improvements!
>
> 3.4 I do not see anything shameful for anybody
> to abound an ideological movement which HAVE its
> POSITIVE achievements in the PAST but has lost
> its positives = progressives in the present
> days.
>
> 4. TODAY, we have more than ENOUGH of the
> environmental regulations to keep our natural
> habitats suitable for the safe and decent living.
>
> 5. I do not hesitate to say: " THANK YOU, for
> MANY of these POSITIVE environmental improvements
> to OUR habitat; among them illumination of the
> acid rains, revival of the many poisoned water
> bodies in OUR "dark industrial" past".
>
> 5.1 Now, it would be a POSITIVE step for you to
> help US with the creation sort of a "Green
> militia" for the safe transporting of the Spent
> Fuel to Yucca.
>
> 5.2 To some it may sound romantic or even naive?
> But,
> What could be a better assurance for you for a
> safe relocation of the S. Fuel?
>
> 5.3 Of course, it is if you are a "progressive
> green/environmentalist"
> By that I mean that you want IMPROVEMENTS rather
> than pursuing a PURE "green idea" for this
> planet with "Greenfields", but with NO people on
> it....
>
>
> Truce,
>
> Emil.
>
> P.S.
>
> NOT to offend ANY one HERE.
> I have noticed that you were posting Gandhi's
> expression with your email signature.
>
> Here is a little bit on the past and present of
> the world's socio-economical politics.
> I believe that Gandhi COULD've done better for
> the people in India in socio-economical terms.
> The PRESENT "cast system" and drinking water
> problem are some of them.
> Discrimination by the outsiders ( by British) was
> UNacceptable but discrimination among your own
> people is ACCEPTABLE?
> Isn't it a "Blind Locality Syndrome" kind of a
> dysfunctional family problems?
> It has nothing to do against India in particular,
> generally, many people may be surprised that a
> similar "Cast System" exists in some very
> advanced countries.
> I guess, getting enough food and water does not
> necessary bring a peace to the family. :-)
>
> It just stops fights for the food...........
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting,
> just $8.95/month.
> http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing
> list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put
> the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
> with no subject line.
>
************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing
> list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put
> the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
> with no subject line.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.