[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Are you a statistician?"



Oh well.  Another *plonk*  Norm was lonesome I'm sure.  The question "are

you a statistician" is still open but I won't see the answer.



The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.





----- Original Message -----

From: "Jim Nelson" <nelsonjima@HOTMAIL.COM>

Cc: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:16 PM

Subject: RE: "Are you a statistician?"





> Mr. Dukelow,

>

> We will indeed need to agree to disagree.  I think papers by Field and

Smith

> are very persuasive.  It looks like other scientist who adhere to the

> "scientific method" feel the same way.  I see this posting at the Iowa

> website http://www.cheec.uiowa.edu/misc/radon.html confirms my beliefs.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

------

>

> COMMENTS FROM OTHER SCIENTIST

> "The Iowa Radon Lung Cancer Study, conducted by Drs. R. William Field,

> Charles F. Lynch and colleagues represents by far the most substantial

study

> of residential radon health effects accomplished to date. By rigorous

> analysis of radon exposures for women with lung cancer and matched

controls,

> this study has shown a clear association between lung cancer and radon

> exposures in homes.

>

> A major advantage of this study was the high radon levels found in Iowa

> homes, which showed about a 50% increase in lung cancer risk at the EPA

> action level of 4 pCi/L. The Iowa lung Cancer Study is a major milestone

for

> confirming lung cancer incidence due to radon exposures as predicted by

the

> National Academy of Sciences BEIR VI report. The researchers should be

> highly commended for this definitive study showing substantial lung cancer

> risks due to radon exposures in homes."

>

> Raymond Johnson, Certified Health Physicist

> (Past) President, Health Physics Society

>

> I would be glad to discuss this directly with you after you unpack and

check

> the assertions I made. Please email me directly.

>

> Jim Nelson

>

>

> >"Are you a statistician?"  Ah, the subtle appeal to authority.  I am as

> >much of

> >a statistician as the average epidemiologist.  My education is in

> >mathematics

> >and nuclear engineering, with an MA and ABD in Math and an MS in Nuclear

> >Engineering.  In my career in the nuclear business I have worked

primarily

> >as a

> >risk and safety analyst.  Risk analysis, of course, is essentially

> >probabilistic

> >and statistical.  Before my mid-life crisis and switch to nuclear

> >engineering, I

> >taught math full- and part-time in universities and colleges in the U.S.

> >and

> >Venezuela.  Since 1986, I have been on the adjunct faculty in Computer

> >Science

> >at the local campus of Washington State University -- and more recently

> >adjunct

> >faculty in Mathematics, teaching on the order of 12-15 courses during

that

> >time

> >-- all of them mathematics, sometimes lightly disguised as computer

> >science.  I

> >have taught Baby Statistics and upper division Probability and Statistics

a

> >number of times.

> >

> >That said, I consider myself a mathematician and engineer rather than a

> >statistician.  I know enough statistics to be dangerous to myself and

> >others and

> >have, on various occasions, demonstrated both sides of that assertion.

> >

> >I am familiar with Bill Field's Iowa radon study and with his criticisms

of

> >Cohen's work and have discussed both with him.  I am unpersuaded.  For

the

> >moment, I think we are agreeing to disagree.

> >

> >You make an interesting assertion about Cohen's data that I cannot check

> >immediately, as I am in the process of unpacking my office from a recent

> >carpet

> >replacement.  My strong impression/memory of his papers is that his

control

> >for

> >confounding is very strong, much more so than any of the papers Field's

> >cites,

> >including his own.

> >

> >Are you a statistician, Mr. Nelson?

> >

> >Best regards.

> >

> >Jim Dukelow

> >Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

> >Richland, WA

> >jim.dukelow@pnl.gov

> >

> >These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved by my

> >management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.

>

>

> _________________________________________________________________

> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>

>

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.