[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Are you a statistician?"
> From: "Doug Huffman" <dhuffman@awod.com>
> Oh well. Another *plonk* Norm was lonesome I'm sure. The question "are
> you a statistician" is still open but I won't see the answer.
>
> The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.
But at least it's the "Emperor with no clothes" costume! :-)
Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Nelson" <nelsonjima@HOTMAIL.COM>
>> Mr. Dukelow,
>>
>> We will indeed need to agree to disagree. I think papers by Field and Smith
>> are very persuasive. It looks like other scientist who adhere to the
>> "scientific method" feel the same way. I see this posting at the Iowa
>> website http://www.cheec.uiowa.edu/misc/radon.html confirms my beliefs.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> COMMENTS FROM OTHER SCIENTIST
>> "The Iowa Radon Lung Cancer Study, conducted by Drs. R. William Field,
>> Charles F. Lynch and colleagues represents by far the most substantial study
>> of residential radon health effects accomplished to date. By rigorous
>> analysis of radon exposures for women with lung cancer and matched controls,
>> this study has shown a clear association between lung cancer and radon
>> exposures in homes.
>>
>> A major advantage of this study was the high radon levels found in Iowa
>> homes, which showed about a 50% increase in lung cancer risk at the EPA
>> action level of 4 pCi/L. The Iowa lung Cancer Study is a major milestone for
>> confirming lung cancer incidence due to radon exposures as predicted by the
>> National Academy of Sciences BEIR VI report. The researchers should be highly
>> commended for this definitive study showing substantial lung cancer risks due
>> to radon exposures in homes."
>>
>> Raymond Johnson, Certified Health Physicist
>> (Past) President, Health Physics Society
>>
>> I would be glad to discuss this directly with you after you unpack and check
>> the assertions I made. Please email me directly.
>>
>> Jim Nelson
>>
>>> "Are you a statistician?" Ah, the subtle appeal to authority. I am as much
>>> of a statistician as the average epidemiologist. My education is in
>>> mathematics and nuclear engineering, with an MA and ABD in Math and an MS in
>>> Nuclear Engineering. In my career in the nuclear business I have worked
>>> primarily as a risk and safety analyst. Risk analysis, of course, is
>>> essentially probabilistic and statistical. Before my mid-life crisis and
>>> switch to nuclear engineering, I taught math full- and part-time in
>>> universities and colleges in the U.S. and Venezuela. Since 1986, I have
>>> been on the adjunct faculty in Computer Science at the local campus of
>>> Washington State University -- and more recently adjunct faculty in
>>> Mathematics, teaching on the order of 12-15 courses during that time -- all
>>> of them mathematics, sometimes lightly disguised as computer science. I
>>> have taught Baby Statistics and upper division Probability and Statistics a
>>> number of times.
>>>
>>> That said, I consider myself a mathematician and engineer rather than a
>>> statistician. I know enough statistics to be dangerous to myself and others
>>> and have, on various occasions, demonstrated both sides of that assertion.
>>>
>>> I am familiar with Bill Field's Iowa radon study and with his criticisms of
>>> Cohen's work and have discussed both with him. I am unpersuaded. For the
>>> moment, I think we are agreeing to disagree.
>>>
>>> You make an interesting assertion about Cohen's data that I cannot check
>>> immediately, as I am in the process of unpacking my office from a recent
>>> carpet replacement. My strong impression/memory of his papers is that his
>>> control for confounding is very strong, much more so than any of the papers
>>> Field's cites, including his own.
>>>
>>> Are you a statistician, Mr. Nelson?
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>> Jim Dukelow
>>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>>> Richland, WA
>>> jim.dukelow@pnl.gov
>>>
>>> These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved by my
>>> management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.