[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

US scientists focus radiation beams to beat cancer



Index:



US scientists focus radiation beams to beat cancer

S. Korean bomb survivor's supporters ask state not to appeal

Global Energy Industry Evaluates Nuclear Power to Meet Future Electric Demand

Triconex Receives Certification From the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

===============================================



US scientists focus radiation beams to beat cancer

  

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Handyman Mort Levy said he hadn't been sick a day in his life 

until he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. 



Levy left his California home two years ago to undergo 10 weeks of intense state-of-

the-art radiation therapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, 

one of a handful of hospitals then offering the treatment. 



Levy's tumor was successfully destroyed and he has since returned to work. 



"I did a lot of research," said Levy, 72. "I didn't like my other options. I didn't want 

surgery and I didn't want local radiation -- there are too many complications, like 

incontinence." 



The increasingly popular treatment Levy received, called intensity modulated 

radiation therapy (IMRT), uses digital technology and computer-generated images to 

aim powerful radiation beams at tumors and avoid damaging healthy organs and 

tissue nearby. 



Because the radiation beams are more precise, doctors can deliver more cancer-

killing energy than with conventional radiation and patients suffer fewer and less 

severe side effects such as hair loss, dry mouth due to gland damage, or rectal 

problems. 



Studies on prostate cancer patients have shown that delivering higher doses of 

radiation improves the cure rate and reduces complications. 



A growing number of U.S. hospitals, almost four dozen in 23 states, are equipping 

themselves to provide IMRT, which requires costly specialized training. 



The treatment option will gain adherents with higher government health insurance 

reimbursement rates that go into effect in early 2002, according to Varian Medical 

Systems Inc.<VAR.N>, the world's largest maker of radiation equipment. 



"Our goal is to have 180 or 200 hospitals offering this (technology) a year from now," 

Varian president and chief executive Richard Levy said. Levy is no relation to patient 

Mort Levy. 



CANCER ON THE RISE 



The incidence of cancer of all kinds is rising about 3 percent a year in the United 

States as the population ages. The American Cancer Society has estimated that 1.2 

million new U.S. U.S. cancer cases are diagnosed each year. 



U.S. cancer treatment outlays total about $60 billion annually, with $1.4 billion of that 

spent on radiation therapy. The balance mostly is spent on drugs for chemotherapy 

and on surgical procedures. 



IMRT, which has mostly been used to treat prostate and head and neck cancers, is 

increasingly being employed against breast and lung cancers thanks to the 

enhancements that allow radioactive beams to hit moving targets as the patient 

breathes. 



"Respiratory gating (the tracking technology) tackles a problem we've had with 

radiotherapy since it's inception. The tumor moves as the patient breathes, especially 

a tumor in the abdomen and lungs," said Richard Emory, chief medical physicist at 

Saint Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York. 



"The radiation beams have been fixed and we have not been able to compensate for 

that until now," he said. 



Radiation therapy has come a long way since being introduced in the 1930s when 

cobalt machines were were used to treat cancer patients. 



"It was a very brute force-type approach. It was sort of like dropping an atom bomb 

on a city ... everything else anywhere near the tumor also gets radiation," Varian's 

Levy said. 



In the late 1960s, improvements in radiology made it possible to focus the radiation 

better, and radiation therapy became a standard treatment for U.S. cancer patients. 



The advent of sophisticated computers made it possible to scan the diseased area 

and plan out treatment. 



"The next challenge is to make (eradicating tumors) so easy and so fast that it 

minimizes the amount of training so that it's essentially a push-button type of 

operation. We're not there yet, but we've made giant steps in that direction," he said. 

------------------



S. Korean bomb survivor's supporters ask state not to appeal

  

NAGASAKI, Jan. 1 (Kyodo) - Supporters of a South Korean survivor of the 1945 

atomic bombing of Nagasaki staged a sit-in in the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima 

for about one hour Tuesday, calling for the state not to appeal a court ruling made 

last December in favor of the survivor. 



About 25 people supporting 74-year-old Lee Kang Young's court case conducted the 

sit-in at Peace Park in Nagasaki, while another group of about 25 people conducted 

a sit-in in Hiroshima in rainy weather. Lee's supporters in Nagasaki will stage a sit-in 

every day through Jan. 9, the expiration date for filing an appeal. 



On Dec. 26 last year, the Nagasaki District Court ordered the state to pay a total of 

1.03 million yen in health-care allowances that it failed to give Lee after he left Japan 

following a brief stay for treatment in 1994. 



The ruling was in favor of Lee, who claimed that the 1994 Atomic Bomb Victims 

Relief Law does not say A-bomb survivors living outside Japan are excluded from 

receiving such benefits. He had demanded 4 million yen in compensation. 



The Nagasaki court's decision followed a landmark ruling by the Osaka District Court 

on June 1 last year that ordered the state to pay Kwak Kwi Hoon, a South Korean 

survivor of the 1945 A-bombing in Hiroshima, health-care allowances that it stopped 

providing after he left Osaka for South Korea following treatment in 1998. 



''A judicial decision approving the application of the Atomic Bomb Victims Relief Law 

for atomic bomb survivors abroad has been presented at the two district courts in 

Osaka and Nagasaki. As long as (this country is) a country ruled by law, the state 

should not file an appeal,'' said Nobuto Hirano, a member of Lee's support group. 



Lee was exposed to radiation when he was working at a munitions factory in 

Nagasaki when the United States dropped the A-bomb on the city Aug. 9, 1945. He 

was 17 years old at that time. 



The ruling came after Health, Labor and Welfare Minister Chikara Sakaguchi 

announced Dec. 18 that Japan will help overseas A-bomb survivors visit Japan to 

undergo treatment beginning fiscal 2002, with Tokyo earmarking some 500 million 

yen for the project for the year. 



But critics say the proposal will not help since overseas survivors, most in their 70s 

and 80s, have to travel to Japan to receive the allowances for treatment. 



The Osaka ruling marked the first time a Japanese court had found overseas A-

bomb survivors eligible to receive such allowances from Japan. But the state and the 

Osaka prefectural government appealed the ruling June 15 last year. 

---------------------



Global Energy Industry Evaluates Nuclear Power to Meet Future Electric Demand, in 

an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

  

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 2, 2002 - High energy prices experienced in 

2001 will be remembered as the common element in most companies' financial 

statements. The news for steel makers and other big electricity consumers 

throughout the world was the same -- high energy prices, inadequate power supply, 

and interrupted services put a major dent in earnings. The energy crisis in early 2001 

forced companies to scale back production, shutdown foundries, mills and smelters, 

and layoff employees. Government and industry were forced to ration electricity, 

formulate energy saving strategies, and increase capital investment in power 

generation projects. For example, the Brazilian government instituted an energy-

rationing plan that forces steel makers and other big electricity consuming industries 

to reduce power consumption up to 20%. 



With world population continuing to grow the need for more energy infrastructure can 

no longer be disputed. What is debatable is how to meet the ever-increasing need for 

energy in a more environmental friendly way. As governments and industry scramble 

to look for solutions to the recent energy crises, countries are forced to rethink their 

stands on nuclear energy. 



Countries like the United States, India, Russia, and United Kingdom are turning their 

attention to nuclear power. Research by Industrialinfo.com shows that nuclear power 

currently provides just under a quarter of the UK's electricity generation. In the U.S., 

there are 103 operational Nuclear Power plants, providing 20% of the nation's 

electricity. 



Interest to expand nuclear energy continues on. The United Kingdom is considering 

a strategic energy policy to revise its current nuclear policy for electricity generation. 

Support for nuclear power came last May when the U.S. set up a commission to 

license new reactors. The NEI reports that the U.S. will add 50,000MW of nuclear 

capacity by 2020. Australia, the leading producer of uranium, just recently authorized 

construction of a uranium mine. In India, three nuclear power plants will come online 

by 2006. Russia is planning a $700 million (USD) nuclear district heating plant, online 

by 2010. 



Unlike power generation from fossil fuel, uranium is less fuel intensive and requires 

minimal supplies. Uranium averages about two parts per million of the earth's crust. 

Although, a vast amount of it occurs in the world's oceans, it is of a lower 

concentration. Known recoverable uranium ore resources are found in Australia 27% 

(889,000 metric tons), Kazakhstan 17% (558,000 metric tons), Canada 15% 

(511,000 metric tons), and South Africa 11% (354,000 metric tons) (Uranium: 

resources, production and demand 1999 ECD NEA & IAEA, July 2000). Australia 

and Canada are the world's major producers and exporters of Uranium. 



Industrialinfo.com provides daily news on the industrial market place including 

specialized databases for energy specific markets. For more information on trends 

and future opportunities occurring in the Power Generation market, including other 

industrial and energy sectors send inquiries to powergroup@industrialinfo.com or 

visit us at www.industrialinfo.com or www.iirenergy.com. 



-----------------



Triconex Receives Certification From the Nuclear Regulatory Commission For 

TRICON

  

IRVINE, Calif., Jan. 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Triconex, a unit of Invensys and the world 

leader in providing industrial safety and critical control applications, announced today 

that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued a Safety Evaluation 

Report (SER) approving Tricon Version 9 for use in 1E nuclear power plant 

Instrument and Control (I&C) systems. 



"We saw a demand for digital safety system upgrades within the nuclear industry and 

knew TRICON would be a perfect fit," said Mike Phillips, vice president of business 

development at Triconex.  "Triconex has been a quality 10CFR50 appendix B 

manufacturer since the start of this initiative, three years ago." 



The generic qualification of TRICON Version 9 is the first TMR (Triple Modular 

Redundant) system to be qualified by the NRC.  The SER encompasses both the 

software and hardware, including termination panels, chassis, power supplies, main 

processor modules, communication modules, input/output modules and 

interconnecting cabling. 



"For the existing 103 nuclear plants in the United States and new advanced nuclear 

plants to be competitive and reliable, the triple redundant TRICON needs to be an 

integral part of the instrumentation and control scheme," said Ted Quinn, vice 

president of utility services for MDM of Laguna Niguel, Calif. and past president of 

the American Nuclear Society.  "The addition of this technology is a milestone that 

will enhance the future upgrades and new designs of nuclear facilities." 



Since the introduction of the first TRICON in 1986, Triconex has become the leader 

in critical controls and safety system applications.  Every country and industry that 

uses TRICON has scrutinized the design and quality of manufacturing to assure 

compliance to their standards.  TRICON has passed the rigorous compliance 

process in each of these countries.  There are over 4,000 TRICONs in use today 

worldwide, all in safety and critical control applications, having accumulated over 

145,000,000 hours of operation without failure on demand. 



About Triconex   



Triconex is a global leader in the supply of products, systems, and services for 

safety, critical control and turbomachinery applications.  Since its inception in 1983, 

the company has installed thousands of control systems solutions in a wide variety of 

industries and applications worldwide. Triconex products are based on patented 

Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) technology.  Today, Triconex TMR products 

operate in over 4,000 installations throughout the world, making Triconex the largest 

and most successful TMR supplier in the world.  For more information, visit the 

Triconex home page at http://www.triconex.com . 



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle				Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100   

Director, Technical			Extension 2306

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service	Fax:(714) 668-3149 	           

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.		E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue  	E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com   

Costa Mesa, CA 92626                    



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/