[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Shipyard workers and references -- Second try
The latest Health Pysics has an interesting article providing
evidence for an adaptive response induced in humans by natural radiation
levels of the order of 100 mGy per year. The population studied is from a
region of Iran rich in radium eroded from uranium bearing minerals. The
authors observed a significant decrease in chromosome abberations produced
by 1.5 Gy in those living in this high background area compared to
controls living in an area with more normal levels, presumably about 2 mGy
per year. The authors claim this is not strictly hormesis, because it is
increased resistance to damage rather than an induced beneficial effect. I
think this is a very fine distinction indeed. In any event the study was
not done on simple organisms, or cells in vitro. In my humble opinion no
single study can be taken as complete confirmation, but if the results are
substantiated this would be an important contribution to the body of
empirical knowledge regarding the effects of low levels of low LET
radiation on humans.
Sincerely,
Bill Prestwich
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Jacobus, John (OD/ORS) wrote:
> Jim,
> I was always worried about the health of paramecium. Do you know if they
> seek out radiation sources in the wild?
>
> I think the comments by the authors are interesting, noting my emphases. Do
> you know if any studies were done on adding free-radicals chemically to the
> growing media?
>
> "The data show clearly that under certain *ill-defined* but
> reproducible conditions capable of autonomous existence are stimulated to
> grow and divide by continuous exposure to *very low dose rates* of either
> corpuscular or electromagnetic radiation of an energy."
>
> "At the present time one can *only speculate* concerning the modes
> of
> action and sites of origin of the stimulant. An attractive and plausible
> hypothesis may be based on the production of free radicals by the absorbed
> energy and the stimulation by such radicals of metabolic activities. Low
> doses rates would produce *radicals or other reaction products* in amounts
> small enough to be stimulating while high dose rates would lead to toxic
> concentrations of the same or other substance."
>
> I think the RSH should seek more paramecium research efforts.
>
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> 3050 Traymore Lane
> Bowie, MD 20715-2024
>
> E-mail: jenday1@email.msn.com (H)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Muckerheide [mailto:jmuckerheide@cnts.wpi.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:56 PM
> To: Jack_Earley@RL.GOV; Jack_Earley@RL.GOV; muckerheide@MEDIAONE.NET;
> jenday1@EMAIL.MSN.COM; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: RE: Shipyard workers and references
>
>
> You mean like:
> http://cnts.wpi.edu/rsh/Data_Docs/1-3/2/Rev2%201321da53.html
> . . .
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/