[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Nucl Week on French Acad of Med statement on LNT &"Disinform ation"
Dr. Rozental,
Thank you for the information. But I guess the larger question is how is
that recommendation being translated into the regulations? Should and shall
have very different meanings, are those who have to interpret regulations
know.
How are the individual countries been writing their regulations? I
don't think the US there has not been a big more to adopt these
recommendations. We are still using ICRP 26 recommendations.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD 20715-2024
E-mail: jenday1@email.msn.com (H)
-----Original Message-----
From: J. J. Rozental [mailto:joseroze@netvision.net.il]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Jacobus, John (OD/ORS); RadSafe
Subject: Re: Nucl Week on French Acad of Med statement on LNT
&"Disinform ation"
According with ICRP recommendation it is implicit that the dose constraint
for optmisation should not exceed 20 mSv in a year - ICRP 60, page 40, (166)
last para.
. . .
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/