[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cohen's Fallacy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Rad health wrote:
>
> I read the papers and I agree with Field, that you are confusing individual
> level confounding with group level confounding. Why not follow Field's
> suggestion and examine the source of the group level confounding?
> You have no basis for guessing what the group level confounding is by
> assuming it is the same as individual level confounding.
--I do not assume it is the same as individual level confounding.
I would prefer to discuss this in terms of particular example. Let's
consider my treatment of what I call "the Lubin effect" in my paper in
Health Physics 75:18-22;1998. Let me know what you don't agree with in
that paper.
> >
> > --I would prefer if you read my paper, but very briefly, I make
> >assumptions about them, calculate what correlations are necessary to
> >explain my data, and consider the plausibility of these required
> >correlations judged by my studies of hundreds of other factors whose
> >correlations with radon I have investigated.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/