RE: Re: Cohen's Fallacy

["Rad health" <healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM>]

But as Kai, points out there must be some mechanism.



>From: BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>

>Reply-To: BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>

>To: Rad health <healthrad@HOTMAIL.COM>

>CC: Jack_Earley@RL.GOV, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu, motnivas@YAHOO.COM,    

>     tjsav@LYCOS.COM

>Subject: RE: Re: Cohen's Fallacy

>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:54:59 -0500 (EST)

>

>

>On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Rad health wrote:

>

> >

> > That is the question I have asked Dr. Cohen to explain numerous times.

> > Please provide a definitive explanation as to why the radon 

>concnetrations

> > show a rather large inverse correlation with smoking?

>

>	--It is not my responsibility to explain this, although I could

>speculate on reasons if that were important. It is not important for my

>studies. My job is to find out what the correlations are and take them

>into account in my analyses.

>

>************************************************************************

>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

>send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

>radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. 

>You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

>





_________________________________________________________________

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/